RADIOTHERAPY BREAST BOOST WITH REDUCED WHOLE-BREAST DOSE IS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVED COSMESIS: THE RESULTS OF A COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT FROM THE ST. GEORGE AND WOLLONGONG RANDOMIZED BREAST BOOST TRIAL

被引:39
作者
Hau, Eric [1 ]
Browne, Lois H. [1 ]
Khanna, Sam [1 ]
Cail, Stacy [1 ]
Cert, Grad [1 ]
Chin, Yaw [1 ]
Clark, Catherine [1 ]
Inder, Stephanie [1 ]
Szwajcer, Alison [1 ]
Graham, Peter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] St George Hosp, Canc Care Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2012年 / 82卷 / 02期
关键词
Breast cancer; Radiotherapy; Boost; Cosmeis; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONSERVING TREATMENT; AESTHETIC EVALUATION; OBJECTIVE EVALUATION; COSMETIC EVALUATION; RADIATION-THERAPY; CANCER-TREATMENT; EORTC BOOST; PATIENT; OBSERVERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.025
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate comprehensively the effect of a radiotherapy boost on breast cosmetic outcomes after 5 years in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery. Methods: The St. George and Wollongong trial (NCT00138814) randomized 688 patients with histologically proven Tis-2, N 0-1, M0 carcinoma to the control arm of 50 Gy in 25 fractions (342 patients) and the boost arm of 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the whole breast followed by a 16 Gy in 8 fraction electron boost (346 patients). Five-year cosmetic outcomes were assessed by a panel subjectively in 385 patients and objectively using pBRA (relative breast retraction assessment). A subset of patients also had absolute BRA measurements. Clinician assessment and patient self-assessment of overall cosmetic and specific items as well as computer BCCT.core analysis were also performed. Results: The boost arm had improved cosmetic overall outcomes as scored by the panel and BCCT.core software with 79% (p = 0.016) and 81% (p = 0.004) excellent/good cosmesis respectively compared with 68% in no-boost arm. The boost arm also had lower pBRA and BRA values with a mean difference of 0.60 and 1.82 mm, respectively, but was not statistically significant. There was a very high proportion of overall excellent/good cosmetic outcome in 95% and 93% in the boost and no boost arms using patient self-assessment. However, no difference in overall and specific items scored by clinician assessment and patient self-assessment was found. Conclusion: The results show the negative cosmetic effect of a 16-Gy boost is offset by a lower whole-breast dose of 45 Gy. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:682 / 689
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]   The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with breast conservation [J].
Al-Ghazal, SK ;
Blamey, RW ;
Stewart, J ;
Morgan, DAL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 25 (06) :566-570
[3]   Patient evaluation of cosmetic outcome after conserving surgery for treatment of primary breast cancer [J].
Al-Ghazal, SK ;
Fallowfield, L ;
Blamey, RW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 25 (04) :344-346
[4]   Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer:: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial [J].
Bartelink, Harry ;
Horiot, Jean-Claude ;
Poortmans, Philip M. ;
Struikmans, Henk ;
Van den Bogaert, Walter ;
Fourquet, Alain ;
Jager, Jos J. ;
Hoogenraad, Willem J. ;
Oei, S. Bing ;
Warlam-Rodenhuis, Carla C. ;
Pierart, Marianne ;
Collette, Laurence .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (22) :3259-3265
[5]  
Bland M, 2000, INTRO MED STAT, P149
[6]   CONSERVATIVE BREAST-CANCER-TREATMENT - ANALYSIS OF COSMETIC RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CONCOMITANT ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
BORGER, JH ;
KEIJSER, AH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1987, 13 (08) :1173-1177
[7]   Turning subjective into objective:: The BCCT.core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment [J].
Cardoso, Maria Joao ;
Cardoso, Jaime ;
Amaral, Natalia ;
Azevedo, Isabel ;
Barreau, Lise ;
Bernardo, Mario ;
Christie, David ;
Costa, Susy ;
Fitzal, Florian ;
Fougo, Jose L. ;
Johansen, Jorgen ;
Macmillan, Douglas ;
Mano, Maria Piera ;
Regolo, Lea ;
Rosa, Jose ;
Teixeira, Luis ;
Vrieling, Conny .
BREAST, 2007, 16 (05) :456-461
[8]   Interobserver agreement and consensus over the esthetic evaluation of conservative treatment for breast cancer [J].
Cardoso, MJ ;
Cardoso, J ;
Santos, AC ;
Barros, H ;
de Oliveira, MC .
BREAST, 2006, 15 (01) :52-57
[9]   Choosing observers for evaluation of aesthetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment [J].
Cardoso, MJ ;
Santos, AC ;
Cardoso, J ;
Barros, H ;
De Oliveira, MC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (03) :879-881
[10]   Towards an intelligent medical system for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment [J].
Cardso, Jaime S. ;
Cardos, Maria J. .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2007, 40 (02) :115-126