Surgical Outcome Analysis of Large and Giant Petroclival Meningiomas with Special Reference to Quality of Life Issues

Background: Management strategies for petroclival menigiomas remain controversial Objectives: We share our experience in management of large and giant true petroclival meniongiomas with special emphasis on patient reported quality of life parameters. Methods: This is a single center study of 47 patients between 2008 and 2018. All patients were checked for tumor specific parameters, clinical parameters, extent of surgical excision, and outcome, as assessed by Karnofsky performance score (KPS), Glasgow outcome score, clinical status, and by SF-36 questionnaire. Results: 32/47 patients' data were assessed. Symptoms included headache (62.5%), involvement of 5th nerve (47%), facial nerve (40.6%), lower cranial nerves (37.5%), cerebellar signs (84%), and long tract signs in (50%) of patients. The mean preoperative KPS was 83.75+/-6.59. Surgical approaches included retromastoid suboccipital craniotomy (50%), Kawase's approach (31.25%), and others in 18.25% patients. 40.625% (n = 13) had a gross total excision, near total resection (NTR) was achieved in 53.125% (n = 17), and 6.25% (n = 2) had a subtotal excision (STE). In 13 patients who had gross total resection (GTR), there were 12 (70.5%) new neurological deficits, while among the 19 patients with NTR, only 5 (29.5%) new neurological deficits were seen. No new onset neurological deficit was seen in patients with STE of tumor. Patient assessed QoL parameters were worse in patients with GTR and best in patients with NTR/STE + GKRS. Conclusion: In patients of large/giant petroclival meningiomas, NTE/STE with adjuvant GKRS provided better preservation of quality of life.