HURWA robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves component positioning and alignment - A prospective randomized and multicenter study

被引:36
作者
Li, Zheng [1 ]
Chen, Xin [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoquan [2 ]
Zhang, Bo [3 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Fan, Yu [1 ]
Yan, Jun [4 ]
Zhang, Xiaofeng [4 ]
Zhao, Yu [4 ]
Lin, Yuan [3 ]
Liu, Jun [2 ]
Lin, Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Hosp, Dept Joint Surg, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chaoyang Hosp, Dept Orthoped, 8th Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Beijing 100020, Peoples R China
[4] BEIJING HURWA ROBOT Med Technol Co Ltd, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Total knee arthroplasty; TKA; Osteoarthritis; OSTEOARTHRITIS; SURVIVAL; MINIMUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jot.2021.12.004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The objective of this study was to compare the radiologic and clinical outcomes of HURWA robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to those of conventional TKA. Methods: A total of 150 patients were randomized into two groups - 73 and 77 patients underwent robotic-assisted TKA and conventional TKA, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score, Knee Society Score (KSS) and range of motion (ROM) were obtained and compared between these two groups. The preoperative and postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and the rate of HKA <= 3 degrees in the two groups were also compared. Results: The postoperative mean HKA angle was 1.801 degrees +/- 1.608 degrees of varus for the robotic-assisted TKA group and 3.017 degrees +/- 2.735 degrees of varus for the conventional TKA group; these values were significantly different. The alignment rate for mechanical axis lower than 3 degrees in the robotic-assisted TKA group and the conventional TKA group were 81.2% and 63.5%, respectively. Patients undergone robotic-assisted TKA or conventional TKA had similarly improved knee flexion and functional recovery reflected by WOMAC score, HSS score, SF-36 score and KSS. Conclusion: HURWA robotic-assisted TKA is a safe and effective, resulting in better alignment for mechanical axis than conventional TKA. The improvement in knee flexion and functional recovery after HURWA robotic-assisted TKA were similar to those after conventional TKA. However, longer follow-up is needed to determine whether the improved alignment of mechanical axis will produce better long-term clinical outcomes. The translational potential of this article: Recently, the robotic-assisted TKA system has been introduced to clinical practice for TKA. Several robotic-assisted TKA systems, including CASPAR, Tsolution, ROSA, ROBODOC and Mako, have been implemented into clinical application.However, the clinical application of these robotic systems was limited due to their technical complexity, insufficient versatility and increased operative time. Until now, there are still no robotic-assisted TKA systems approved by the National Medical Products Administration of China. Therefore, more robotic-assisted TKA systems need to be designed and improved, particularly in China. Through our randomized, multicenter, single blind and parallel controlled trial, we showed that HURWA robotassisted TKA system is a safe and effective system for TKA, which had improved knee flexion.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 40
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Extramedullary femoral alignment system in total knee arthroplasty: Accuracy in relation of severity and different types of varus [J].
Aquili, Alberto ;
Cane, Pier Paolo ;
Fravisini, Marco ;
Farinelli, Luca ;
Procaccini, Roberto ;
Gigante, Antonio Pompilio .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 24 :86-90
[2]   Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial [J].
Banger, M. S. ;
Johnston, W. D. ;
Razii, N. ;
Doonan, J. ;
Rowe, P. J. ;
Jones, B. G. ;
MacLean, A. D. ;
Blyth, M. J. G. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2020, 102B (11) :1511-1518
[3]   Assistive technologies in knee arthroplasty: fashion or evolution? Rate of publications and national registries prove the Scott Parabola wrong [J].
Batailler, Cecile ;
Parratte, Sebastien .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2021, 141 (12) :2027-2034
[4]   Concepts and techniques of a new robotically assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: the ROSA knee system [J].
Batailler, Cecile ;
Hannouche, Didier ;
Benazzo, Francesco ;
Parratte, Sebastien .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2021, 141 (12) :2049-2058
[5]   MAKO CT-based robotic arm-assisted system is a reliable procedure for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review [J].
Batailler, Cecile ;
Fernandez, Andrea ;
Swan, John ;
Servien, Elvire ;
Haddad, Fares S. ;
Catani, Fabio ;
Lustig, Sebastien .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2021, 29 (11) :3585-3598
[6]  
Bercovy M, 2020, KNEE SURG SPORTS TRA
[7]   Does psychological distress influence postoperative satisfaction and outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty? A prospective cohort study [J].
Bian, Tao ;
Shao, Hongyi ;
Zhou, Yixin ;
Huang, Yong ;
Song, Yang .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
[8]   Patient expectations and satisfaction in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a prospective two-year outcome study [J].
Blum, Christopher L. ;
Lepkowsky, Eric ;
Hussein, Adil ;
Wakelin, Edgar A. ;
Plaskos, Christopher ;
Koenig, Jan A. .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2021, 141 (12) :2155-2164
[9]   Are There Differences in Accuracy or Outcomes Scores Among Navigated, Robotic, Patient-specific Instruments or Standard Cutting Guides in TKA? A Network Meta-analysis [J].
Bouche, Pierre-Alban ;
Corsia, Simon ;
Dechartres, Agnes ;
Resche-Rigon, Matthieu ;
Nizard, Remy .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 478 (09) :2105-2116
[10]  
Chan Jason, 2020, Surg Technol Int, V37, P299