Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grades the Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer

被引:5
作者
Morote, Juan [1 ,2 ]
Borque-Fernando, Angel [3 ]
Triquell, Marina [1 ]
Celma, Anna [1 ]
Regis, Lucas [1 ]
Mast, Richard [4 ]
de Torres, Ines M. [5 ,6 ]
Semidey, Maria E. [5 ,6 ]
Santamaria, Anna [7 ]
Planas, Jacques [1 ]
Esteban, Luis M. [8 ]
Trilla, Enrique [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vall dHebron Hosp, Dept Urol, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Surg, Barcelona 08193, Spain
[3] Hosp Univ Miguel Servet, Dept Urol, IIS Aragon, Zaragoza 50009, Spain
[4] Vall dHebron Hosp, Dept Radiol, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[5] Vall dHebron Hosp, Dept Pathol, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[6] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Morphol Sci, Barcelona 08193, Spain
[7] Vall dHebron Res Inst, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[8] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Appl Math, Escuela Univ Politecn Almunia, Zaragoza 50100, Spain
关键词
prostate cancer; aggressiveness; magnetic resonance imaging; PI-RADS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.3390/cancers14071828
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness can be assessed from clinical and pathologic surrogate endpoints as the International Society of Uropathology grade group (GG) in prostate biopsies, the type of pathology from surgical specimens, the clinical stage, and the risk of biochemical recurrence after treatment of localised PCa. Low evidence exists about the association between prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and PCa aggressiveness beyond the known increased risk of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) as Prostate Imaging and Data Report System (PI-RADS) increase. Therefore, we confirm previous data and generate new evidence from all the previous surrogate endpoints of PCa aggressiveness, confirming that MRI grades the aggressiveness of PCa. We sought to find further evidence showing the increase in PCa aggressiveness as PI-RADS score increases from four surrogates of PCa aggressiveness: i. prostate biopsy GG (<= 3 vs. >3), ii. type of pathology in surgical specimens (favourable vs. unfavourable), iii. clinical stage (localised vs. advanced), and risk of recurrence of localised PCa after primary treatment (low-intermediate vs. high). A group of 692 PCa patients were diagnosed after 3-T multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and guided and/or systematic biopsies, showing csPCa (GG >= 2) in 547 patients (79%) and insignificant PCa (iPCa) in 145 (21%). The csPCa rate increased from 32.4% in PI-RADS < 3 to 95.5% in PI-RADS 5 (p < 0.001). GG >= 3 was observed in 7.6% of PCa with PI-RADS < 3 and 32.6% in those with PI-RADS > 3 (p < 0.001). Unfavourable pathology was observed in 38.9% of PCa with PI-RAD < 3 and 68.3% in those with PI-RADS > 3 (p = 0.030). Advanced disease was not observed in PCa with PI-RADS <= 3, while it existed in 12.7% of those with PI-RADS > 3 (p < 0.001). High-risk recurrence localised PCa was observed in 9.5% of PCa with PI-RADS < 3 and 35% in those with PI-RADS > 3 (p = 0.001). The PI-RADS score was an independent predictor of all surrogates of PCa aggressiveness as PSA density. We confirmed that mpMRI grades PCa aggressiveness.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Shape Analysis of Peripheral Zone Observations on Prostate DWI: Correlation to Histopathology Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Abreu-Gomez, Jorge ;
Wu, Mark ;
McInnes, Matthew D. F. ;
Thornhill, Rebecca E. ;
Flood, Trevor A. ;
Schieda, Nicola .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 214 (06) :1239-1247
[2]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[3]   MRI grading for the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness [J].
Boschheidgen, M. ;
Schimmoeller, L. ;
Arsov, C. ;
Ziayee, F. ;
Morawitz, J. ;
Valentin, B. ;
Radke, K. L. ;
Giessing, M. ;
Esposito, I ;
Albers, P. ;
Antoch, G. ;
Ullrich, T. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (04) :2351-2359
[4]   STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration [J].
Cohen, Jeremie F. ;
Korevaar, Daniel A. ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Bruns, David E. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine A. ;
Hooft, Lotty ;
Irwig, Les ;
Levine, Deborah ;
Reitsma, Johannes B. ;
de Vet, Henrica C. W. ;
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. .
BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (11)
[5]   Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Blank, K ;
Broderick, GA ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, CJ ;
Wein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :969-974
[6]   Granulomatous prostatitis mimicking prostate cancer in a patient with psoriatic arthritis: a case report [J].
De Luca, Luigi ;
Crocetto, Felice ;
Barone, Biagio ;
Creta, Massimiliano ;
Pesce, Salvatore ;
Aveta, Achille ;
Campanino, Maria Raffaela ;
Imbimbo, Ciro ;
Longo, Nicola .
FUTURE SCIENCE OA, 2020, 6 (07)
[7]   The utility of prostate MRI within active surveillance: description of the evidence [J].
Dominique, Georgina ;
Brisbane, Wayne G. ;
Reiter, Robert E. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (01) :71-77
[8]   National Prostate Cancer Screening Rates After the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Discouraging Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening [J].
Drazer, Michael W. ;
Huo, Dezheng ;
Eggener, Scott E. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (22) :2416-U18
[9]   Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, with or Without Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Drost, Frank-Jan H. ;
Osses, Daniel ;
Nieboer, Daan ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Schoots, Ivo G. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 77 (01) :78-94
[10]   The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Delahunt, Brett ;
Srigley, John R. ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) :244-252