Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit

被引:142
作者
May, Carl R. [2 ]
Finch, Tracy [1 ]
Ballini, Luciana [3 ]
MacFarlane, Anne [4 ]
Mair, Frances [5 ]
Murray, Elizabeth [6 ]
Treweek, Shaun [7 ]
Rapley, Tim [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Fac Hlth Sci, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
[3] Agenzia Sanit & Sociale Reg, Bologna, Italy
[4] Natl Univ Ireland, Discipline Gen Practice, Galway, Ireland
[5] Univ Glasgow, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, Acad Unit Gen Practice & Primary Care, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
[6] UCL, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London WC1E 6BT, England
[7] Univ Dundee, Qual Safety & Informat Res Grp, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
MODEL; CARE; IMPLEMENTATION; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-11-245
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Normalization Process Theory (NPT) can be used to explain implementation processes in health care relating to new technologies and complex interventions. This paper describes the processes by which we developed a simplified version of NPT for use by clinicians, managers, and policy makers, and which could be embedded in a web-enabled toolkit and on-line users manual. Methods: Between 2006 and 2010 we undertook four tasks. (i) We presented NPT to potential and actual users in multiple workshops, seminars, and presentations. (ii) Using what we discovered from these meetings, we decided to create a simplified set of statements and explanations expressing core constructs of the theory (iii) We circulated these statements to a criterion sample of 60 researchers, clinicians and others, using SurveyMonkey to collect qualitative textual data about their criticisms of the statements. (iv) We then reconstructed the statements and explanations to meet users' criticisms, embedded them in a web-enabled toolkit, and beta tested this 'in the wild'. Results: On-line data collection was effective: over a four week period 50/60 participants responded using SurveyMonkey (40/60) or direct phone and email contact (10/60). An additional nine responses were received from people who had been sent the SurveyMonkey form by other respondents. Beta testing of the web enabled toolkit produced 13 responses, from 327 visits to http://www.normalizationprocess.org. Qualitative analysis of both sets of responses showed a high level of support for the statements but also showed that some statements poorly expressed their underlying constructs or overlapped with others. These were rewritten to take account of users' criticisms and then embedded in a web-enabled toolkit. As a result we were able translate the core constructs into a simplified set of statements that could be utilized by non-experts. Conclusion: Normalization Process Theory has been developed through transparent procedures at each stage of its life. The theory has been shown to be sufficiently robust to merit formal testing. This project has provided a user friendly version of NPT that can be embedded in a web-enabled toolkit and used as a heuristic device to think through implementation and integration problems.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
    AJZEN, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 179 - 211
  • [2] Angus D, 2006, IMPLEMENT SCI, V1, DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-1-4
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, UNDERSTANDING IMPLEM
  • [4] Banister P., 1994, QUALITATIVE METHODS
  • [5] The influence of context and process when implementing e-health
    Boddy, David
    King, Gerry
    Clark, Julia S.
    Heaney, David
    Mair, Frances
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2009, 9
  • [6] How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms
    Bunge, M
    [J]. PHILOSOPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2004, 34 (02) : 182 - 210
  • [7] Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health
    Campbell, M
    Fitzpatrick, R
    Haines, A
    Kinmonth, AL
    Sandercock, P
    Spiegelhalter, D
    Tyrer, P
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7262): : 694 - 696
  • [8] Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care
    Campbell, Neil C.
    Murray, Elizabeth
    Darbyshire, Janet
    Emery, Jon
    Farmer, Andrew
    Griffiths, Frances
    Guthrie, Bruce
    Lester, Helen
    Wilson, Phil
    Kinmonth, Ann Louise
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7591): : 455 - 459
  • [9] Adjuvant therapy for resected gastric cancer-rapid, yet incomplete adoption following results of intergroup 0116 trial
    Coburn, Natalie G.
    Guller, Ulrich
    Baxter, Nancy N.
    Kiss, Alex
    Ringash, Jolie
    Swallow, Carol J.
    Law, Calvin H. L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 70 (04): : 1073 - 1080
  • [10] Arduous implementation: Does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Legare, France
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Edwards, Adrian
    May, Carl
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2008, 3 (1)