Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Dexamethasone A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Dose-Response Trial

被引:55
作者
Ahadian, Farshad M. [1 ,2 ]
McGreevy, Kai [3 ]
Schulteis, Gerhard [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Anesthesiol, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[2] VA San Diego Healthcare Syst, Anesthesia Serv, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Neurol, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[4] VA San Diego Healthcare Syst, Res Serv, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
PAIN CLINICAL-TRIALS; STEROID INJECTIONS; PARTICULATE; INFARCTION;
D O I
10.1097/AAP.0b013e318232e843
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: Serious adverse events related to particulate steroids have curtailed the use of transforaminal epidural steroid injections for radicular pain. Dexamethasone has been proposed as an alternative. We investigated the efficacy, dose-response profile, and safety of 3 doses of epidural dexamethasone. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging design was used. A total of 98 subjects were randomized to transforaminal epidural dexamethasone 4 mg (n = 33), 8 mg (n = 33), or 12 mg (n = 32). The primary outcome measure for this study was reduction in radicular pain according to the visual analog scale from baseline, with 30% reduction or higher considered clinically meaningful. Secondary measures included the Oswestry Low Back Disability Scale, Subject Global Impression of Change, Subject Global Satisfaction Scale, and adverse events. Outcomes were assessed at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after injection. Outcome measures, sample size, and statistical analysis were defined before enrollment. Results: Mean radicular pain according to the visual analog scale compared with baseline was reduced 41.7%, 33.5%, and 26.6% at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively, after injection. Oswestry disability ratings declined from "moderate" at baseline to "minimal" at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after injection. There was no statistical difference between groups for either measure (all P values < 0.05, Bonferroni-corrected). Parallel effects were observed in "impression of change" and "satisfaction" measures. No serious adverse events were noted. Conclusions: Transforaminal epidural dexamethasone provides statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in radicular pain at 12 weeks after injection, with parallel improvements in disability, impression of change, and satisfaction measures. There was no difference in efficacy for dexamethasone 4 mg compared with 8 or 12 mg. The optimal dose of epidural dexamethasone may be lower than 4 mg, further increasing the long-term safety and tolerability of this treatment. Current data are reassuring with regard to the safety of dexamethasone for transforaminal epidural steroid injection.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 578
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Cerebellar herniation after cervical transforaminal epidural injection [J].
Beckman, William A. ;
Mendez, Robert J. ;
Paine, Gregory F. ;
Mazzilli, Michael A. .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2006, 31 (03) :282-285
[2]   Comparison of the particle sizes of different steroids and the effect of dilution - A review of the relative neurotoxicities of the steroids [J].
Benzon, Honorio T. ;
Chew, Teng-Leong ;
McCarthy, Robert J. ;
Benzon, Hubert A. ;
Walega, David R. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 106 (02) :331-338
[3]   Intra-Arterial Injection in the Rat Brain Evaluation of Steroids Used for Transforaminal Epidurals [J].
Dawley, Joshua D. ;
Moeller-Bertram, Tobias ;
Wallace, Mark S. ;
Patel, Piyush M. .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (16) :1638-1643
[4]   Comparative effectiveness of cervical transforaminal injections with particulate and nonparticulate corticosteroid preparations for cervical radicular pain [J].
Dreyfuss, P ;
Baker, R ;
Bogduk, N .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2006, 7 (03) :237-242
[5]   Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations [J].
Dworkin, RH ;
Turk, DC ;
Farrar, JT ;
Haythornthwaite, JA ;
Jensen, MP ;
Katz, NP ;
Kerns, RD ;
Stucki, G ;
Allen, RR ;
Bellamy, N ;
Carr, DB ;
Chandler, J ;
Cowan, P ;
Dionne, R ;
Galer, BS ;
Hertz, S ;
Jadad, AR ;
Kramer, LD ;
Manning, DC ;
Martin, S ;
McCormick, CG ;
McDermott, MP ;
McGrath, P ;
Quessy, S ;
Rappaport, BA ;
Robbins, W ;
Robinson, JP ;
Rothman, M ;
Royal, MA ;
Simon, L ;
Stauffer, JW ;
Stein, W ;
Tollett, J ;
Wernicke, J ;
Witter, J .
PAIN, 2005, 113 (1-2) :9-19
[6]   Research design considerations for confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations [J].
Dworkin, Robert H. ;
Turk, Dennis C. ;
Peirce-Sandner, Sarah ;
Baron, Ralf ;
Bellamy, Nicholas ;
Burke, Laurie B. ;
Chappell, Amy ;
Chartier, Kevin ;
Cleeland, Charles S. ;
Costello, Ann ;
Cowan, Penney ;
Dimitrova, Rozalina ;
Ellenberg, Susan ;
Farrar, John T. ;
French, Jacqueline A. ;
Gilron, Ian ;
Hertz, Sharon ;
Jadad, Alejandro R. ;
Jay, Gary W. ;
Kalliomaki, Jarkko ;
Katz, Nathaniel P. ;
Kerns, Robert D. ;
Manning, Donald C. ;
McDermott, Michael P. ;
McGrath, Patrick J. ;
Narayana, Arvind ;
Porter, Linda ;
Quessy, Steve ;
Rappaport, Bob A. ;
Rauschkolb, Christine ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Rhodes, Thomas ;
Sampaio, Cristina ;
Simpson, David M. ;
Stauffer, Joseph W. ;
Stucki, Gerold ;
Tobias, Jeffrey ;
White, Richard E. ;
Witter, James .
PAIN, 2010, 149 (02) :177-193
[7]   A Comparison of Change in the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale to a Pain Relief Scale and Global Medication Performance Scale in a Short-term Clinical Trial of Breakthrough Pain Intensity [J].
Farrar, John T. ;
Polomano, Rosemary C. ;
Berlin, Jesse A. ;
Strom, Brian L. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 112 (06) :1464-1472
[8]   Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Young, JP ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Werth, JL ;
Poole, RM .
PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) :149-158
[9]  
Glaser Scott E, 2005, Pain Physician, V8, P309
[10]  
Houten John K, 2002, Spine J, V2, P70, DOI 10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00159-0