HUMAN TRUST IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH

被引:792
|
作者
Glikson, Ella [1 ]
Woolley, Anita Williams [2 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Org Behav, Grad Sch Business Adm, Ramat Gan, Israel
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Org Behav & Theory, Tepper Sch Business, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION; ANTHROPOMORPHISM INCREASES TRUST; PRODUCT RECOMMENDATION AGENTS; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; PHYSICALLY PRESENT; SOCIAL PRESENCE; SERVICE ROBOTS; AUTOMATION; PERFORMANCE; WORLD;
D O I
10.5465/annals.2018.0057
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) characterizes a new generation of technologies capable of interacting with the environment and aiming to simulate human intelligence. The success of integrating AI into organizations critically depends on workers' trust in AI technology. This review explains how AI differs from other technologies and presents the existing empirical research on the determinants of human "trust" in AI, conducted in multiple disciplines over the last 20 years. Based on the reviewed literature, we identify the form of AI representation (robot, virtual, and embedded) and its level of machine intelligence (i.e., its capabilities) as important antecedents to the development of trust and propose a framework that addresses the elements that shape users' cognitive and emotional trust. Our review reveals the important role of AI's tangibility, transparency, reliability, and immediacy behaviors in developing cognitive trust, and the role of AI's anthropomorphism specifically for emotional trust. We also note several limitations in the current evidence base, such as the diversity of trust measures and overreliance on short-term, small sample, and experimental studies, where the development of trust is likely to be different than in longer-term, higher stakes field environments. Based on our review, we suggest the most promising paths for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 660
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is trust in artificial intelligence systems related to user personality? Review of empirical evidence and future research directions
    Riedl, Rene
    ELECTRONIC MARKETS, 2022, 32 (04) : 2021 - 2051
  • [2] Trust in Artificial Intelligence
    Sethumadhavan, Arathi
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2019, 27 (02) : 34 - 34
  • [3] Artificial Intelligence and Human Trust in Healthcare: Focus on Clinicians
    Asan, Onur
    Bayrak, Alparslan Emrah
    Choudhury, Avishek
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (06)
  • [4] Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI
    Jacovi, Alon
    Marasovic, Ana
    Miller, Tim
    Goldberg, Yoav
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 ACM CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, FACCT 2021, 2021, : 624 - 635
  • [5] Trust in artificial intelligence: From a Foundational Trust Framework to emerging research opportunities PREFACE
    Lukyanenko, Roman
    Maass, Wolfgang
    Storey, Veda C.
    ELECTRONIC MARKETS, 2022, 32 (04) : 1993 - 2020
  • [6] How transparency modulates trust in artificial intelligence
    Zerilli, John
    Bhatt, Umang
    Weller, Adrian
    PATTERNS, 2022, 3 (04):
  • [7] Integrating artificial intelligence and human resource management: a review and future research agenda
    Gong, Qinyan
    Fan, Di
    Bartram, Timothy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2025, 36 (01) : 103 - 141
  • [8] Relationship Between Trust in the Artificial Intelligence Creator and Trust in Artificial Intelligence Systems: The Crucial Role of Artificial Intelligence Alignment and Steerability
    Saffarizadeh, Kambiz
    Keil, Mark
    Maruping, Likoebe
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2024, 41 (03) : 645 - 681
  • [10] Trust and trustworthy artificial intelligence: A research agenda for AI in the environmental sciences
    Bostrom, Ann
    Demuth, Julie L.
    Wirz, Christopher D.
    Cains, Mariana G.
    Schumacher, Andrea
    Madlambayan, Deianna
    Bansal, Akansha Singh
    Bearth, Angela
    Chase, Randy
    Crosman, Katherine M.
    Ebert-Uphoff, Imme
    Gagne, David John
    Guikema, Seth
    Hoffman, Robert
    Johnson, Branden B.
    Kumler-Bonfanti, Christina
    Lee, John D.
    Lowe, Anna
    McGovern, Amy
    Przybylo, Vanessa
    Radford, Jacob T.
    Roth, Emilie
    Sutter, Carly
    Tissot, Philippe
    Roebber, Paul
    Stewart, Jebb Q.
    White, Miranda
    Williams, John K.
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2024, 44 (06) : 1498 - 1513