Ethical Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: A Critical Literature Review

被引:40
作者
Taquette, Stella R. [1 ]
Borges da Matta Souza, Luciana Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estado Rio De Janeiro, Med Sci Coll, Dept Pediat, 444 Prof Manoel de Abreu Ave,2 Floor Vila Isabel, BR-20550170 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
ethical inquiry; methods in qualitative inquiry; virtual environments; secondary data analysis; observational research; focus groups; autoethnography; HEALTH RESEARCH; REFLEXIVITY; ISSUES; REFLECTIONS; CHALLENGES; STRATEGIES; GUIDELINES; PEOPLE; TOPICS; FIELD;
D O I
10.1177/16094069221078731
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The respect for ethical principles is required during the entire scientific research process, including the dissemination phase. Due to the dynamism of qualitative studies, there are often adverse ethical situations. The aim of this integrative review was to analyze and synthetize ethical dilemmas that occur during the progress of qualitative investigation and the strategies proposed to face them. The search for studies used LILACS and MEDLINE databases with descriptors "research ethics" and "qualitative research", originating 108 titles. Upon reading all titles, 42 articles were elected according to the inclusion criteria. The main conflicts were related to confidentiality breach, disregard of autonomy, potential damages, confusion about the roles of researcher/therapist/friend, and impasses in the Research Ethics Committees. Various types of conflicts may occur in a research. The solutions proposed are based on self-awareness, reflexivity, continuous consent, and ethical mindfulness.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, DOI DOI 10.1080/13645570116992
[2]   Examining Data Repository Guidelines for Qualitative Data Sharing [J].
Antes, Alison L. ;
Walsh, Heidi A. ;
Strait, Michelle ;
Hudson-Vitale, Cynthia R. ;
DuBois, James M. .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2018, 13 (01) :61-73
[3]  
Baker Lindsay, 2016, J Grad Med Educ, V8, P607
[4]   Ethical Reflections: Examining Reflexivity Through the Narrative Paradigm [J].
Bishop, Emily C. ;
Shepherd, Marie L. .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2011, 21 (09) :1283-1294
[5]   Holistic Experiences and Strategies for Conducting Research With Couples [J].
Braybrook, Debbie E. ;
Mroz, Lawrence W. ;
Robertson, Steve ;
White, Alan ;
Milnes, Kate .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2017, 27 (04) :584-590
[6]   Bioethics and research into mental health [J].
Braz, Marlene ;
Schramm, Fermin Roland .
CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2011, 16 (04) :2035-2044
[7]   Special considerations in conducting bereavement focus groups [J].
Briller, Sherylyn H. ;
Schim, Stephanie Myers ;
Meert, Kathleen L. ;
Thurston, Celia S. .
OMEGA-JOURNAL OF DEATH AND DYING, 2007, 56 (03) :255-271
[8]  
Bulpitt Helen, 2010, Nurse Res, V17, P7
[10]   Online interviewing with interpreters in humanitarian contexts [J].
Chiumento, Anna ;
Machin, Laura ;
Rahman, Atif ;
Frith, Lucy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE STUDIES ON HEALTH AND WELL-BEING, 2018, 13 (01)