First-trimester aspiration abortion practices: a survey of United States abortion providers

被引:14
作者
White, Katharine O. [1 ]
Jones, Heidi E. [2 ]
Lavelanet, Antonella [1 ]
Norman, Wendy V. [3 ]
Guilbert, Edith [4 ]
Lichtenberg, E. Steve [5 ]
Paul, Maureen [6 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Boston Med Ctr, 850 Harrison Ave,Dowling 4402, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] CUNY, Grad Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Policy, 55 W 125th St, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Univ British Columbia, 320-5950 Univ Blvd, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
[4] Inst Natl Sante Publ Quebec, 945 Ave Wolfe, Quebec City, PQ G1V 5B3, Canada
[5] Family Planning Med Associates Med Grp Ltd, 659 West Washington Blvd, Chicago, IL 60661 USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, 330 Brookline Ave,KS-3, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
Abortion; induced; Abortion techniques; Pregnancy trimester; first; Dilation and curettage; United States; Evidenced-based practice; SURGICAL ABORTION; SERVICE AVAILABILITY; PAIN-CONTROL; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2018.08.011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess whether first-trimester aspiration abortion practices of US providers agree with evidence based policy guidelines. Study design: We sent surveys by mail or electronically to all abortion facilities in the United States identified via professional networks and websites from June through December 2013. Administrators reported on the volume of procedures performed at their site(s) through 13 weeks 6 days' gestation and on clinic services. Clinicians reported on personal demographic characteristics and abortion practices. We reviewed guidelines from key US professional organizations to determine how well reported practices aligned with available recommendations and the extent to which guidelines have changed since the time of the survey. Results: We identified 703 clinical sites in the United States; 383 (54%) sites responded, 256 of which offer first trimester aspiration abortions. Most providers identified as obstetrician-gynecologists (74%) and female (64%); 52% were less than 50 years old compared to 36% in 2002. Overall, reported practices follow evidence-based guidelines, including routine administration of periprocedure antibiotics (85%), use of misoprostol for cervical ripening in the late first trimester (94%), pain management practices, and same-day contraception provision (98%) including long-acting devices (76%). Less evidence-based practices include routine preprocedure ultrasound (99%), not providing abortion before 5 weeks' gestation (66%), restrictive fasting policies, and prolonged and postprocedure antibiotic provision. Conclusion: Overall, the first-trimester aspiration abortion practices revealed in our survey agree with professional evidence-based policy guidelines, though some related to preprocedure ultrasound use, very early abortion provision, preanesthesia fasting protocols, and antibiotic regimens deserve attention. Implications: In this third cross-sectional survey of US abortion practices (prior surveys 1997 and 2002), first-trimester aspiration abortion providers are younger than before, reflecting an improvement in the "graying" of the abortion provider workforce. Research and education are needed to further improve evidence-based practice in abortion care. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 15
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Society of Family Planning clinical guidelines pain control in surgical abortion part 1-local anesthesia and minimal sedation
    Allen, Rebecca H.
    Singh, Rameet
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2018, 97 (06) : 471 - 477
  • [2] Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks' gestation)
    Allen, Rebecca H.
    Goldberg, Alisa B.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 93 (04) : 277 - 291
  • [3] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2009, OBSTET GYNECOL, V113, P1180, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a6d011
  • [4] Prevention of infection after induced abortion
    不详
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 83 (04) : 295 - 309
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2018, OBSTET GYNECOL
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2018, The safety and quality of abortion care in the United States, DOI DOI 10.17226/24950
  • [7] [Anonymous], CLIN POL GUID AB CAR
  • [8] Eliminating the routine postoperative surgical abortion visit
    Gatter, Mary
    Roth, Nitzan
    Safarian, Catherin
    Nucatola, Deborah
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 86 (04) : 397 - 401
  • [9] Routine follow-up visits after first-trimester induced abortion
    Grossman, D
    Ellertson, C
    Grimes, DA
    Walker, D
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (04) : 738 - 745
  • [10] Guttmacher Institute, 2018, IND AB US