Factors associated with inappropriate use of emergency departments: findings from a cross-sectional national study in France

被引:45
|
作者
Naouri, Diane [1 ,2 ]
Ranchon, Guillaume [3 ]
Vuagnat, Albert [4 ]
Schmidt, Jeannot [5 ,6 ]
El Khoury, Carlos [3 ,7 ]
Yordanov, Youri [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Sorbonne Univ, Hop St Antoine, AP HP, Serv Accueil Urgences, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris Sud, Univ Paris Saclay, UVSQ, French Natl Inst Hlth & Med Res INSERM U1018,Ctr, Villejuif, France
[3] Medipole, Emergency Dept, Villeurbanne, France
[4] Univ Hosp, Biostat & Bioinformat DIM, Dijon, France
[5] Clermont Ferrand Univ Hosp, Emergency Dept, Clermont Ferrand, France
[6] Univ Clermont Auvergne, EA 4679, Clermont Ferrand, France
[7] RESCUe RESUVal, INSERM, HESPER EA 7425, Lyon, France
[8] Sorbonne Univ, INSERM, Inst Pierre Louis Epidemiol & Sante Publ, UMR S 1136, Paris, France
关键词
emergency department; primary care; healthcare quality improvement; health services research; NON-URGENT UTILIZATION; PRIMARY-CARE; NONURGENT EMERGENCY; HEALTH; VISITS; INEQUALITIES; CONTINUITY; SERVICES; INSURANCE; ACCIDENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009396
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Inappropriate visits to emergency departments (EDs) could represent from 20% to 40% of all visits. Inappropriate use is a burden on healthcare costs and increases the risk of ED overcrowding. The aim of this study was to explore socioeconomic and geographical determinants of inappropriate ED use in France. Method The French Emergency Survey was a nationwide cross-sectional survey conducted on June 11 2013, simultaneously in all EDs in France and covered characteristics of patients, EDs and counties. The survey included 48 711 patient questionnaires and 734 ED questionnaires. We focused on adult patients (>= 15 years old). The appropriateness of the ED visit was assessed by three measures: caring physician appreciation of appropriateness (numeric scale), caring physician appreciation of whether or not the patient could have been managed by a general practitioner and ED resource utilisation. Descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic regression were used to examine determinants of inappropriate ED use, estimating adjusted ORs and 95% CIs. Results Among the 29 407 patients in our sample, depending on the measuring method, 13.5% to 27.4% ED visits were considered inappropriate. Regardless of the measure method used, likelihood of inappropriate use decreased with older age and distance from home to the ED >10 km. Not having a private supplementary health insurance, having universal supplementary health coverage and symptoms being several days old increased the likelihood of inappropriate use. Likelihood of inappropriate use was not associated with county medical density. Conclusion Inappropriate ED use appeared associated with socioeconomic vulnerability (such as not having supplementary health coverage or having universal coverage) but not with geographical characteristics. It makes us question the appropriateness of the concept of inappropriate ED use as it does not consider the distress experienced by the patient, and segments of society seem to have few other choices to access healthcare than the ED.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 464
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Primary care and population factors associated with NHS Health Check coverage: a national cross-sectional study
    Artac, M.
    Dalton, A. R. H.
    Babu, H.
    Bates, S.
    Millett, C.
    Majeed, A.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 35 (03) : 431 - 439
  • [32] The Quebec emergency department guide: A cross-sectional study to evaluate its use, perceived usefulness, and implementation in rural emergency departments
    Fleet, Richard
    Hegg-Deloye, Sandrine
    Maltais-Giguere, Julie
    Legare, France
    Ouimet, Mathieu
    Poitras, Julien
    Tanguay, Alain
    Archambault, Patrick
    Levesque, Jean-Frederic
    Simard-Racine, Genevieve
    Dupuis, Gilles
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 21 (01) : 103 - 110
  • [33] Dental pain in the medical emergency department: a cross-sectional study
    Currie, C. C.
    Stone, S. J.
    Connolly, J.
    Durham, J.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 44 (02) : 105 - 111
  • [35] A cross-sectional study of factors associated with unstable housing among marginalized people who use drugs in Ottawa, Canada
    Rowlands Snyder, Ellen C.
    Boucher, Lisa M.
    Bayoumi, Ahmed M.
    Martin, Alana
    Marshall, Zack
    Boyd, Rob
    LeBlanc, Sean
    Tyndall, Mark
    Kendall, Claire E.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07):
  • [36] Profile of Patients With Acute Low Back Pain Who Sought Emergency Departments A Cross-sectional Study
    Oliveira, Indiara Soares
    Vanin, Adriane Aver
    Pena Costa, Leonardo Oliveira
    Medeiros, Flavia Cordeiro
    Ananias Oshima, Renan Kendy
    Inacio, Angela Augusto
    Matos Cunha, Thayane Araujo
    Palomo, Andressa Santos
    Fukuda, Thiago Yukio
    de Freitas, Diego Galace
    Benvenuto, Fernando
    Menezes Costa, Luciola Cunha
    SPINE, 2020, 45 (05) : E296 - E303
  • [37] Evaluating effort-reward imbalance among nurses in emergency departments: a cross-sectional study in China
    Tian, Mengge
    Yang, Heping
    Yin, Xiaoxv
    Wu, Yafei
    Zhang, Guopeng
    Lv, Chuanzhu
    Mu, Ketao
    Gong, Yanhong
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [38] Frequent Users of Hospital Emergency Departments in Korea Characterized by Claims Data from the National Health Insurance: A Cross Sectional Study
    Woo, Jung Hoon
    Grinspan, Zachary
    Shapiro, Jason
    Rhee, Sang Youl
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (01):
  • [39] A cross-sectional study describing factors associated with utilisation of GP services by a cohort of people who inject drugs
    Nambiar, Dhanya
    Stoove, Mark
    Dietze, Paul
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
  • [40] Is subjectively perceived treatment urgency of patients in emergency departments associated with self-reported health literacy and the willingness to use the GP as coordinator of treatment? Results from the multicentre, cross-sectional, observational study PiNo Bund
    Schaefer, Ingmar
    Menzel, Agata
    Oltrogge, Jan Hendrik
    Slagman, Anna
    Moeckel, Martin
    Luehmann, Dagmar
    Scherer, Martin
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (11):