Comparative Assessment of SSR and AFLP Markers for Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Conservation of Fig, Ficus carica L., Genetic Resources in Tunisia

被引:65
作者
Baraket, Ghada [1 ]
Chatti, Khaled [1 ]
Saddoud, Olfa [1 ]
Ben Abdelkarim, Ahmed [1 ]
Mars, Messaoud [2 ]
Trifi, Mokhtar [1 ]
Hannachi, Amel Salhi [1 ]
机构
[1] Fac Sci Tunis, Lab Mol Genet Immunol & Biotechnol, Tunis 2092, Tunisia
[2] Higher Agron Inst, UR Agrobiodivers, Chott Mariem 4042, Sousse, Tunisia
关键词
AFLP; Genetic diversity; Fig; Ficus carica L; SSR; Tunisia; MICROSATELLITE MARKERS; INBRED LINES; RAPD; ACCESSIONS; SEQUENCES; RFLPS;
D O I
10.1007/s11105-010-0217-x
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study characterises the genetic variability of fig, Ficus carica L., using simple sequence repeat (SSR) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. It compares the efficiency and utility of the two techniques in detecting variation and establishing genetic relationships among Tunisian fig cultivars. Our results show that using both marker systems, the Tunisian fig germ plasm is characterised by having a large genetic diversity at the deoxyribonucleic acid level, as most of AFLP bands were detected and all SSR markers were polymorphic. In fact, 351 (342 polymorphic) and 57 (57 polymorphic) bands were detected using AFLP and SSR primers, respectively. SSR markers were the most polymorphic with an average polymorphic information content value of 0.94, while AFLP markers showed the highest effective multiplex ratio (56.9) and marker index (45.2). The effective marker index was recorded highest (4.19) for AFLP markers and lowest (0.70) for the SSR ones. Our results demonstrate that (1) independent as well as combined analyses of cluster analyses of SSR and AFLP fragments showed that cultivars are clustered independently from their geographical origin, horticultural classifications and tree sex; (2) the analysis of molecular variance allowed the partitioning of genetic variation within and among fig groups and showed greater variation within groups and (3) AFLP and SSR markers datasets showed positive correlation. This study suggests the SSR and AFLP markers are suitable for diversity analysis and cultivars fingerprinting. An understanding of the genetic diversity and population structure of F. carica in Tunisia can also provide insight into the conservation and management of this species.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 184
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits (Sinauer)
[2]  
BARAKET G, 2009, SCI HORTICULTURAE, V120, P34
[3]   Genetic analysis of Tunisian fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers [J].
Baraket, Ghada ;
Chatti, Khaled ;
Saddoud, Olfa ;
Mars, Messaoud ;
Marrakchi, Mohamed ;
Trifi, Mokhtar ;
Salhi-Hannachi, Amel .
SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2009, 120 (04) :487-492
[4]   Characterisation of genetic diversity in potential biomass willows (Salix spp.) by RAPD and AFLP analyses [J].
Barker, JHA ;
Matthes, M ;
Arnold, GM ;
Edwards, KJ ;
Åhman, I ;
Larsson, S ;
Karp, A .
GENOME, 1999, 42 (02) :173-183
[5]   Suitability of isozyme, RAPD and AFLP markers to assess genetic differences and relatedness among fig (Ficus carica L.) clones [J].
Cabrita, LF ;
Aksoy, U ;
Hepaksoy, S ;
Leitao, JM .
SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2001, 87 (04) :261-273
[6]   A preliminary assessment of the genetic relationship between Erianthus rockii and the "Saccharum complex" using microsatellite (SSR) and AFLP markers [J].
Cai, Q ;
Aitken, KS ;
Fan, YH ;
Piperidis, G ;
Jackson, P ;
McIntyre, CL .
PLANT SCIENCE, 2005, 169 (05) :976-984
[7]  
Chatti K., 2004, FRUITS, V59, P49, DOI [10.1051/fruits:2004006, DOI 10.1051/FRUITS:2004006]
[8]  
Chatti K., 2004, BIOL TUNISIE, V1, P1
[9]   Analysis of genetic diversity and relationships in a Tunisian fig (Ficus carica) germplasm collection by random amplified microsatellite polymorphisms [J].
Chatti, Khaled ;
Saddoud, Olfa ;
Salhi-Hannachi, Amel ;
Mars, Messaoud ;
Marrakchi, Mohamed ;
Trifi, Mokhtar .
JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE PLANT BIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (03) :386-391
[10]  
Dellaporta S, 1983, Plant Mol BiolRep, V1, P19, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02712670