The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation on the Lower Limb Function of Stroke Patients

被引:8
作者
Zhang, Xiao-Hua [1 ]
Gu, Tao [1 ]
Liu, Xuan-Wei [1 ]
Han, Ping [1 ]
Lv, Hui-Lan [1 ]
Wang, Yu-Long [2 ]
Xiao, Peng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Dapeng New DistnCt Nanao Peoples Hosp, Dept Rehabil, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Rehabil, Shenzhen Peoples Hosp 2, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
transcranial direct current stimulation; stroke; somatosensory evoked potential; leg motor function; post-convalescent; SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED-POTENTIALS; BARTHEL INDEX; REHABILITATION; PREDICTION; RECOVERY; INJURY; GAIT;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2021.685931
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to research the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) on the lower limb function of post-convalescent stroke patients.</p> Methods: A total of 122 patients in the stroke recovery stage who suffered from leg dysfunction were randomly divided into two groups: a tDCS group (n = 61) and a FES group (n = 61). All patients received same routine rehabilitation and equal treatment quality, the tDCS group was treated with tDCS, while the FES group received FES. The lower limb Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), modified Barthel index (MBI), functional ambulatory category (FAC), and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) were used to assess the patients at three different stages: prior to treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment.</p> Results: The assessment scores for FMA, MBI, and FAC for the lower extremities after treatment (P > 0.05) were compared with those before treatment. The FMA, MBI, and FAC scores of the tDCS group were significantly higher than those of the FES group in all three stages (P < 0.05). The FMA, MBI, and FAC assessment scores of both groups were significantly higher after 4 weeks of treatment than that before treatment, and the scores after 8 weeks of treatment were significantly higher than those after 4 weeks after treatment (P < 0.05). The P40, N45 latencies decreased and the P40, N45 amplitudes increased, but there was no significant difference before treatment and after treatment (P >0.05), and there was no significant difference of the tDCS and FES groups before treatment and after treatment.</p> Conclusion: In conclusion, FMA, MBI, and FAC indicate that both tDCS and FES can significantly promote the recovery of a patient's leg motor function and tDCS is more effective than FES in the stroke recovery stage. The application value of SEP in stroke patients remains to be further studied.</p>
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Collin C, 1988, Int Disabil Stud, V10, P61
[2]   Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving capacity in activities and arm function after stroke: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials [J].
Elsner, Bernhard ;
Kwakkel, Gert ;
Kugler, Joachim ;
Mehrholz, Jan .
JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 14
[3]   Effectiveness of upper limb functional electrical stimulation after stroke for the improvement of activities of daily living and motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Eraifej, John ;
Clark, William ;
France, Benjamin ;
Desando, Sebastian ;
Moore, David .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
[4]   Somatosensory evoked potentials in patients affected by unilateral cerebrovascular lesions with onset during the perinatal period or adulthood [J].
Ferri, R ;
Elia, M ;
Musumeci, SA ;
Cosentino, FII ;
Roccasalva, G ;
Spada, RS ;
Toscano, G .
JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2001, 16 (08) :541-547
[5]  
Feys H, 2000, Physiother Res Int, V5, P1, DOI 10.1002/pri.180
[6]   Value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in predicting arm recovery after a stroke [J].
Feys, H ;
Van Hees, J ;
Bruyninckx, F ;
Mercelis, R ;
De Weerdt, W .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 68 (03) :323-331
[7]  
Hendricks HT, 1997, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V29, P155
[8]   Treadmill walking with partial body weight support versus floor walking in hemiparetic subjects [J].
Hesse, S ;
Konrad, M ;
Uhlenbrock, D .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1999, 80 (04) :421-427
[9]   Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Patients with Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury [J].
Horn, Janneke ;
Tjepkema-Cloostermans, Marleen C. .
SEMINARS IN NEUROLOGY, 2017, 37 (01) :60-65
[10]   Functional Electrical Stimulation Improves Activity After Stroke: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis [J].
Howlett, Owen A. ;
Lannin, Natasha A. ;
Ada, Louise ;
McKinstry, Carol .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 96 (05) :934-943