Comparison of Signal and Gap-Detection Thresholds for Focused and Broad Cochlear Implant Electrode Configurations

被引:25
作者
Bierer, Julie Arenberg [1 ]
Deeks, John M. [2 ]
Billig, Alexander J. [2 ]
Carlyon, Robert P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] MRC, Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, Cambridge CB2 7EF, England
来源
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY | 2015年 / 16卷 / 02期
关键词
cochlear implants; gap detection; psychophysics; electrode configuration; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; NEURAL RESPONSE; AUDITORY-NERVE; TEMPORAL PITCH; USERS; INTERFACE; TRIPOLAR; CHANNELS; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10162-015-0507-y
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Cochlear implant (CI) users usually exhibit marked across-electrode differences in detection thresholds with "focused" modes of stimulation, such as partial-tripolar (pTP) mode. This may reflect differences either in local neural survival or in the distance of the electrodes from the modiolus. To shed light on these two explanations, we compared stimulus-detection thresholds and gap-detection thresholds (GDTs) at comfortably loud levels for at least four electrodes in each of ten Advanced Bionics CI users, using 1031-pps pulse trains. The electrodes selected for each user had a wide range of stimulus-detection thresholds in pTP mode. We also measured across-electrode variations in both stimulus-detection and gap-detection tasks in monopolar (MP) mode. Both stimulus-detection and gap-detection thresholds correlated across modes. However, there was no significant correlation between stimulus-detection and gap-detection thresholds in either mode. Hence, gap-detection thresholds likely tap a source of across-electrode variation additional to, or different from, that revealed by stimulus-detection thresholds. Stimulus-detection thresholds were significantly lower for apical than for basal electrodes in both modes; this was only true for gap detection in pTP mode. Finally, although the across-electrode standard deviation in stimulus-detection thresholds was greater in pTP than in MP mode, the reliability of these differences-assessed by dividing the across-electrode standard deviation by the standard deviation across adaptive runs for each electrode-was similar for the two modes; this metric was also similar across modes for gap detection. Hence across-electrode differences can be revealed using clinically available MP stimulation, with a reliability comparable to that observed with focused stimulation.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 284
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: Evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration [J].
Bierer, Julie Arenberg .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2007, 121 (03) :1642-1653
[2]  
Bierer JA, 2014, EAR HEARING, V35, P641, DOI 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000058
[3]   Identifying Cochlear Implant Channels with Poor Electrode-Neuron Interface: Partial Tripolar, Single-Channel Thresholds and Psychophysical Tuning Curves [J].
Bierer, Julie Arenberg ;
Faulkner, Kathleen F. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (02) :247-258
[4]   STATISTICS NOTES .12. CALCULATING CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS WITH REPEATED OBSERVATIONS .1. CORRELATION WITHIN-SUBJECTS [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6977) :446-446
[5]   Neural Response Telemetry Reconsidered: I. The Relevance of ECAP Threshold Profiles and Scaled Profiles to Cochlear Implant Fitting [J].
Botros, Andrew ;
Psarros, Colleen .
EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (03) :367-379
[6]   Effect of stimulus level and place of stimulation on temporal pitch perception by cochlear implant users [J].
Carlyon, Robert P. ;
Lynch, Catherine ;
Deeks, John M. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2010, 127 (05) :2997-3008
[7]   Across-site patterns of modulation detection: Relation to speech recognition [J].
Garadat, Soha N. ;
Zwolan, Teresa A. ;
Pfingst, Bryan E. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2012, 131 (05) :4030-4041
[8]   Relationship between gap detection thresholds and loudness in cochlear-implant users [J].
Garadat, Soha N. ;
Pfingst, Bryan E. .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2011, 275 (1-2) :130-138
[9]   Auditory Temporal Acuity Probed With Cochlear Implant Stimulation and Cortical Recording [J].
Kirby, Alana E. ;
Middlebrooks, John C. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 103 (01) :531-542
[10]   Limits of temporal pitch in cochlear implants [J].
Kong, Ying-Yee ;
Deeks, John M. ;
Axon, Patrick R. ;
Carlyon, Robert P. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 125 (03) :1649-1657