Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature

被引:87
作者
Suwa, Katsuhito [1 ]
Okamoto, Tomoyoshi [1 ]
Yanaga, Katsuhiko [2 ]
机构
[1] Jikei Univ, Daisan Hosp, Dept Surg, Sch Med, 4-11-1 Izumihoncho, Tokyo 2018601, Japan
[2] Jikei Univ, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Minato Ku, 3-25-8 Nishi Shinbashi, Tokyo 1058461, Japan
关键词
Ventral hernia; Incisional hernia; Laparoscopic repair; IPOM-plus; Defect closure; COMPONENT SEPARATION; INGUINAL-HERNIA; RECURRENCE RATES; MESH FIXATION; GUIDELINES; SUTURE; EXPERIENCE; STRENGTH; OUTCOMES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00595-015-1219-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The laparoscopic technique for repairing ventral and incisional hernias (VIH) is now well established. However, several issues related to laparoscopic VIH repair, such as the high recurrence rate for hernias with large fascial defects and in extremely obese patients, are yet to be resolved. Additional problems include seroma formation, mesh bulging/eventration, and non-restoration of the abdominal wall rigidity/function with only bridging of the hernial orifice using standard laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (sIPOM). To solve these problems, laparoscopic fascial defect closure with IPOM reinforcement (IPOM-Plus) has been introduced in the past decade, and a few studies have reported satisfactory outcomes. Although detailed techniques for fascial defect closure and handling of the mesh have been published, standardized techniques are yet to be established. We reviewed the literature on IPOM-Plus in the PubMed database and identified 16 reports in which the recurrence rate, incidence of seroma formation, and incidence of mesh bulging were 0-7.7, 0-11.4, and 0 %, respectively. Several comparison studies between sIPOM and IPOM-Plus seem to suggest that IPOM-Plus is associated with more favorable surgical outcomes; however, larger-scale studies are essential.
引用
收藏
页码:764 / 773
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[51]  
Sharma Deborshi, 2010, J Minim Access Surg, V6, P86, DOI 10.4103/0972-9941.68580
[52]   European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients [J].
Simons, M. P. ;
Aufenacker, T. ;
Bay-Nielsen, M. ;
Bouillot, J. L. ;
Campanelli, G. ;
Conze, J. ;
de Lange, D. ;
Fortelny, R. ;
Heikkinen, T. ;
Kingsnorth, A. ;
Kukleta, J. ;
Morales-Conde, S. ;
Nordin, P. ;
Schumpelick, V. ;
Smedberg, S. ;
Smietanski, M. ;
Weber, G. ;
Miserez, M. .
HERNIA, 2009, 13 (04) :343-403
[53]   Triple-Step Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair: Midline Suture Closure Supported by Dorsal Component Separation and Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Reinforcement [J].
Strey, Christoph W. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (12) :3276-3279
[54]   Greater risk of incisional hernia with morbidly obese than steroid dependent patients and low recurrence with prefascial polypropylene mesh [J].
Sugerman, HJ ;
Kellum, JM ;
Reines, HD ;
DeMaria, EJ ;
Newsome, HH ;
Lowry, JW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 171 (01) :80-84
[55]  
Susmallian S, 2001, Hernia, V5, P139
[56]   Prospective non-randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair under different anesthetic methods [J].
Symeonidis, Dimitrios ;
Baloyiannis, Ioannis ;
Koukoulis, George ;
Pratsas, Konstantinos ;
Georgopoulou, Stavroula ;
Efthymiou, Mattheos ;
Tzovaras, George .
SURGERY TODAY, 2014, 44 (05) :906-913
[57]   Pseudo-recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair [J].
Tse, G. H. ;
Stutchfield, B. M. ;
Duckworth, A. D. ;
de Beaux, A. C. ;
Tulloh, B. .
HERNIA, 2010, 14 (06) :583-587
[58]   Closure versus non-closure of hernia defect during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with mesh [J].
Zeichen, M. S. ;
Lujan, H. J. ;
Mata, W. N. ;
Maciel, V. H. ;
Lee, D. ;
Jorge, I. ;
Plasencia, G. ;
Gomez, E. ;
Hernandez, A. M. .
HERNIA, 2013, 17 (05) :589-596