Assessing agreement with relative area under the coverage probability curve

被引:5
作者
Barnhart, Huiman X. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC 27715 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC 27715 USA
关键词
agreement; reliability; coverage probability; measurement error; area under the curve;
D O I
10.1002/sim.6903
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There has been substantial statistical literature in the last several decades on assessing agreement, and coverage probability approach was selected as a preferred index for assessing and improving measurement agreement in a core laboratory setting. With this approach, a satisfactory agreement is based on pre-specified high satisfactory coverage probability (e.g., 95%), given one pre-specified acceptable difference. In practice, we may want to have quality control on more than one pre-specified differences, or we may simply want to summarize the agreement based on differences up to a maximum acceptable difference. We propose to assess agreement via the coverage probability curve that provides a full spectrum of measurement error at various differences/disagreement. Relative area under the coverage probability curve is proposed for the summary of overall agreement, and this new summary index can be used for comparison of different intra-methods or inter-methods/labs/observers' agreement. Simulation studies and a blood pressure example are used for illustration of the methodology. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3153 / 3165
页数:13
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Hypertension: clinical management of primary hypertension in adults
[2]   An overview on assessing agreement with continuous measurements [J].
Barnhart, Huiman X. ;
Haber, Michael J. ;
Lin, Lawrence I. .
JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2007, 17 (04) :529-569
[3]   Choice of agreement indices for assessing and improving measurement reproducibility in a core laboratory setting [J].
Barnhart, Huiman X. ;
Yow, Eric ;
Crowley, Anna Lisa ;
Daubert, Melissa A. ;
Rabineau, Dawn ;
Bigelow, Robert ;
Pencina, Michael ;
Douglas, Pamela S. .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (06) :2939-2958
[4]  
Bland JM, 1999, STAT METHODS MED RES, V8, P135, DOI 10.1177/096228029900800204
[5]   Statistical methods in assessing agreement: Models, issues, and tools [J].
Lin, L ;
Hedayat, AS ;
Sinha, B ;
Yang, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 97 (457) :257-270
[6]   Survival analytical techniques were used to assess agreement of a quantitative variable [J].
Llorca, J ;
Delgado-Rodríguez, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (03) :314-315
[7]   Assessment of agreement of a quantitative variable: a new graphical approach [J].
Luiz, RR ;
Costa, AJL ;
Kale, PL ;
Werneck, GL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (10) :963-967
[8]   THE BRITISH-HYPERTENSION-SOCIETY PROTOCOL FOR THE EVALUATION OF AUTOMATED AND SEMIAUTOMATED BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO AMBULATORY SYSTEMS [J].
OBRIEN, E ;
PETRIE, J ;
LITTLER, W ;
DESWIET, M ;
PADFIELD, PL ;
OMALLEY, K ;
JAMIESON, M ;
ALTMAN, D ;
BLAND, M ;
ATKINS, N .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1990, 8 (07) :607-619
[9]   European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults [J].
O'Brien, Eoin ;
Atkins, Neil ;
Stergiou, George ;
Karpettas, Nikos ;
Parati, Gianfranco ;
Asmar, Roland ;
Imai, Yutaka ;
Wang, Jiguang ;
Mengden, Thomas ;
Shennan, Andrew .
BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2010, 15 (01) :23-38