Diagnostic performance of CD66c in lung adenocarcinoma-associated malignant pleural effusion: comparison with CEA, CA 19-9, and CYFRA 21-1

被引:23
作者
Son, Seung-Myoung [1 ]
Han, Hye-Suk [2 ]
An, Jin Young [2 ]
Choe, Kang Hyeon [2 ]
Lee, Ki Man [2 ]
Lee, Ki Hyeong [2 ]
Kim, So-Seul [1 ]
Lee, Yong-Moon [1 ]
Lee, Ho-chang [1 ]
Song, Hyung Geun [1 ]
Lee, Ok-Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Cheongju 361711, South Korea
[2] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Cheongju 361711, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
CA; 19; CD66c; CEA; CEACAM6; CYFRA; 21; lung adenocarcinoma; pleural effusion; CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN FAMILY; NEURON-SPECIFIC ENOLASE; CROSS-REACTING ANTIGEN; TUMOR-MARKER; PANCREATIC ADENOCARCINOMA; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; GENE-EXPRESSION; CEACAM6; UTILITY; FLUID;
D O I
10.1097/PAT.0000000000000215
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Various tumour markers have been evaluated in malignant pleural effusions, but not CD66c. This study evaluated the diagnostic ability of CD66c in lung adenocarcinoma-associated malignant pleural effusions (LA-MPEs) and compared it with other known tumour markers. Forty-seven cases of LA-MPE and 52 cases of benign pleural effusions were collected. The levels of CD66c, CEA, CA 19-9, and CYFRA 21-1 were measured by enzyme immunoassay. The expression of CD66c, CEA, and CA 19-9 in cell blocks was measured by immunocytochemistry. CEA had the best diagnostic values, with a sensitivity of 87.2% and specificity of 92.3%. Both CD66c and CA 19-9 showed the highest specificity of 98.1%, with sensitivities of 63.8% and 55.3%, respectively. CYFRA 21-1 had a sensitivity of 83.0% and specificity of 76.9%. CEA combined with CA 19-9 reached a sensitivity of 91.5% and a specificity of 98.1%. The sensitivities of immunocytochemical staining for CD66c, CEA, and CA 19-9 were 72.5%, 75%, and 40%, respectively. CD66c showed a diagnostic performance comparable to CYFRA 21-1 and CA 19-9 by enzyme immunoassay. Immunocytochemical study showed that CD66c and CEA were more sensitive than CA19-9. Both studies support CD66c as a potential tumour marker to differentiate LA-MPE from benign effusions.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 129
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Diagnostic value of CEA, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CYFRA 21-1, NSE and TSA assay in pleural effusions [J].
Alatas, F ;
Alatas, Ö ;
Metintas, M ;
Çolak, Ö ;
Harmanci, E ;
Demir, S .
LUNG CANCER, 2001, 31 (01) :9-16
[2]  
ANDERSON CB, 1974, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V33, P916, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197404)33:4<916::AID-CNCR2820330405>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-U
[4]  
BARNETT T, 1988, Genomics, V3, P59, DOI 10.1016/0888-7543(88)90160-7
[5]  
Beauchemin N, 1999, EXP CELL RES, V252, P243
[6]   Inhibition of adhesion, invasion, and metastasis by antibodies targeting CEACAM6 (NCA-90) and CEACAM5 (Carcinoembryonic antigen) [J].
Blumenthal, RD ;
Hansen, HJ ;
Goldenberg, DM .
CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 65 (19) :8809-8817
[7]   Expression patterns of CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 in primary and metastatic cancers [J].
Blumenthal, Rosalyn D. ;
Leon, Evelyn ;
Hansen, Hans J. ;
Goldenberg, David M. .
BMC CANCER, 2007, 7
[8]   CEACAM6 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition and mediates invasion and metastasis in pancreatic cancer [J].
Chen, Jianmin ;
Li, Qiang ;
An, Yong ;
Lv, Nan ;
Xue, Xiaofeng ;
Wei, Jishu ;
Jiang, Kuirong ;
Wu, Junli ;
Gao, Wentao ;
Qian, Zhuyin ;
Dai, Cuncai ;
Xu, Zekuan ;
Miao, Yi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 43 (03) :877-885
[9]   CEACAM6 is a novel biornarker in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and PanIN lesions [J].
Duxbury, MS ;
Matros, E ;
Clancy, T ;
Bailey, G ;
Doff, M ;
Zinner, MJ ;
Ashley, SW ;
Maitra, A ;
Redston, M ;
Whang, EE .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 241 (03) :491-496
[10]   RETRACTED: CEACAM6 gene silencing impairs anoikis resistance and in vivo metastatic ability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells (Retracted article. See FEB, 2023) [J].
Duxbury, MS ;
Ito, H ;
Zinner, MJ ;
Ashley, SW ;
Whang, EE .
ONCOGENE, 2004, 23 (02) :465-473