Did I really want to know this? Pregnant women's reaction to detection of a soft marker during ultrasound screening

被引:44
作者
Ahman, Annika [1 ,2 ]
Runestam, Karin [2 ]
Sarkadi, Anna [2 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Child Publ Hlth Unit, Samariterhemmet, SE-75125 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Fetal ultrasonography; Ultrasonographic soft markers; Chromosomal aberrations; Ethical dilemmas; Psychological aspects; CHOROID-PLEXUS-CYSTS; ECHOGENIC INTRACARDIAC FOCUS; 2ND TRIMESTER; DOWN-SYNDROME; 2ND-TRIMESTER ULTRASOUND; CHROMOSOMAL-ABNORMALITY; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; DECISION-MAKING; INFORMED CHOICE; ROUTINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2009.12.011
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate women's expectations of routine ultrasound and experiences when soft markers were discovered: what the disclosure meant, how it affected them, how they experienced the information given and why they did or did not choose amniocentesis. Design: Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 11 women 25-30 weeks into the pregnancy, 7-13 weeks after the discovery of a soft marker. Findings: Women lacked knowledge about the potential of the scan and detection of soft markers created strong emotional reactions that women thought could have been alleviated by prior information about potential findings. Information in connection with the scan was perceived as insufficient. Decision about amniocentesis was affected by attitudes to disability, anxiety about fetal loss due to the procedure, need for certainty by a diagnostic test, and partner's opinion. Conclusions: Women were shocked by the unexpected and sometimes unwanted information on elevated risk for a chromosomal aberration for which they lacked any preparation. Because this event often has long-lasting effects on the pregnancy, models of information that are efficient in promoting informed decisions are imperative. Practice implications: Both women and their partners need relevant information before and in connection with ultrasound scan to be able to make informed choices. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 93
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   DISQ 5: Counseling women with isolated 'soft' markers at 18-24 weeks [J].
Alfirevic, Z. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 28 (03) :355-355
[2]   Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age:: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years [J].
Andermann, Anne ;
Blancquaert, Ingeborg ;
Beauchamp, Sylvie ;
Dery, Veronique .
BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2008, 86 (04) :317-319
[3]   Ultrasound screening for chromosomal abnormality: Women's reactions to false positive results [J].
Baillie, C ;
Smith, J ;
Hewison, J ;
Mason, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 5 :377-394
[4]   Management options for echogenic intracardiac focus and choroid plexus cysts: A review including Australian Association of Obstetrical and Gynaecological Ultrasonologists consensus statement [J].
Bethune, M. .
AUSTRALASIAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 51 (04) :324-329
[5]   Time to reconsider our approach to echogenic intracardiac focus and choroid plexus cysts [J].
Bethune, Michael .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 48 (02) :137-141
[6]   6-year experience of prenatal diagnosis in an unselected population in Oxford, UK [J].
Boyd, PA ;
Chamberlain, P ;
Hicks, NR .
LANCET, 1998, 352 (9140) :1577-1581
[7]  
Bricker L., 2000, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V4, P1, DOI [DOI 10.3310/hta4160, 10.3310/hta4160]
[8]   Discovery of soft markers on fetal ultrasound: maternal implications [J].
Carolan, Mary ;
Hodnett, Ellen .
MIDWIFERY, 2009, 25 (06) :654-664
[9]   Sonographic markers of fetal aneuploidy - A review [J].
Cicero, S ;
Sacchini, C ;
Rembouskos, G ;
Nicolaides, KH .
PLACENTA, 2003, 24 :S88-S98
[10]   Women's response to fetal choroid plexus cysts detected by prenatal ultrasound [J].
Cristofalo, E. A. ;
DiPietro, J. A. ;
Costigan, K. A. ;
Nelson, P. ;
Crino, J. .
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2006, 26 (04) :215-223