Intelligence 2.0: Reestablishing a Research Program on g in I-O Psychology

被引:45
作者
Scherbaum, Charles A. [1 ]
Goldstein, Harold W.
Yusko, Kenneth P. [2 ]
Ryan, Rachel
Hanges, Paul J. [3 ]
机构
[1] CUNY, Baruch Coll, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10010 USA
[2] Marymt Univ, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
来源
INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE | 2012年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
COGNITIVE-ABILITY; WORKING-MEMORY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; JOB-PERFORMANCE; G MATTERS; VALIDITY; ORGANIZATIONS; PERSONALITY; EMPLOYMENT; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01419.x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Intelligence (i.e., g, general mental ability) is an individual difference that is arguably more important than ever for success in the constantly changing, ever more complex world of business (Boal, 2004; Gatewood, Field, & Barrick, 2011). Although the field of industrialorganizational (IO) psychology initially made substantial contributions to the study of intelligence and its use in applied settings (e.g., Hunter, 1980; Schmidt & Hunter, 1981), we have done relatively little in recent times about studying the nature of the intelligence construct and its measurement. Instead, we have focused predominately on using intelligence to predict performance outcomes and examine racial subgroup differences on intelligence test scores. Although the field of IO psychology continues to approach intelligence at a surface level, other fields (e.g., clinical psychology, developmental and educational research, and neuropsychology) have continued to study this construct with greater depth and have consequently made more substantial progress in understanding this critical and complex construct. The purpose of this article is to note this lack of progress in IO psychology and to challenge our field to mount new research initiatives on this critical construct.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 148
页数:21
相关论文
共 113 条
[91]   The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings [J].
Schmidt, FL ;
Hunter, JE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1998, 124 (02) :262-274
[92]   The role of general cognitive ability and job performance: Why there cannot be a debate [J].
Schmidt, FL .
HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2002, 15 (1-2) :187-210
[93]  
Senge P. M., 1990, 5 DISCIPLINE ART PRA
[94]   "General intelligence " objectively determined and measured [J].
Spearman, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1904, 15 :201-292
[95]  
Sternberg R.J., 1999, Review of General Psychology, V3, P292, DOI [10.1037/1089-2680.3.4.292, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.3.4.292]
[96]  
Sternberg R.J., 1986, WHAT IS INTELLIGENCE
[97]  
Sternberg R. J., 2000, Handbook of Intelligence, DOI [10.1017/cbo9780511807947.002, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511807947.002, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807947]
[98]  
Sternberg R.J., 1997, Thinking styles
[99]  
STERNBERG RJ, 1981, J EDUC PSYCHOL, V73, P1
[100]   The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative skills [J].
Sternberg, Robert J. .
INTELLIGENCE, 2006, 34 (04) :321-350