Can 18F-FDG PET/CT predict EGFR status in patients with non-small cell lung cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:15
作者
Du, Bulin [1 ]
Wang, Shu [1 ]
Cui, Yan [1 ]
Liu, Guanghui [1 ]
Li, Xuena [1 ]
Li, Yaming [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Nucl Med, Shenyang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
nuclear radiology; respiratory tract tumours; genetics; METABOLIC TUMOR VOLUME; FACTOR RECEPTOR MUTATIONS; FDG PET/CT; ADENOCARCINOMA; PARAMETERS; KRAS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044313
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aimed to explore the diagnostic significance of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT for predicting the presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Design A systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources The PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library databases were searched from the earliest available date to December 2020. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies The review included primary studies that compared the mean maximum of standard uptake value (SUVmax) between wild-type and mutant EGFR, and evaluated the diagnostic value of F-18-FDG PET/CT using SUVmax for prediction of EGFR status in patients with NSCLC. Data extraction and synthesis The main analysis was to assess the sensitivity and specificity, the positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR+) and DLR-, as well as the diagnostic OR (DOR) of SUVmax in prediction of EGFR mutations. Each data point of the summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) graph was derived from a separate study. A random effects model was used for statistical analysis of the data, and then diagnostic performance for prediction was further assessed. Results Across 15 studies (3574 patients), the pooled sensitivity for F-18-FDG PET/CT was 0.70 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.79) with a pooled specificity of 0.59 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.66). The overall DLR+ was 1.74 (95% CI 1.49 to 2.03) and DLR- was 0.50 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.65). The pooled DOR was 3.50 (95% CI 2.37 to 5.17). The area under the SROC curve was 0.68 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.72). The likelihood ratio scatter plot based on average sensitivity and specificity was in the lower right quadrant. Conclusion Meta-analysis results showed F-18-FDG PET/CT had low pooled sensitivity and specificity. The low DOR and the likelihood ratio scatter plot indicated that F-18-FDG PET/CT should be used with caution when predicting EGFR mutations in patients with NSCLC.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   Metabolic Phenotype of Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma Relationship With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation [J].
Lee, Elaine Yuen Phin ;
Khong, Pek-Lan ;
Lee, Victor Ho Fun ;
Qian, Wenshu ;
Yu, Xue ;
Wong, Maria Pik .
CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 40 (03) :E190-E195
[22]   FDG Uptake in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Is Not an Independent Predictor of EGFR or KRAS Mutation Status A Retrospective Analysis of 206 Patients [J].
Lee, Seok Mo ;
Bae, Sang Kyun ;
Jung, Soo Jin ;
Kim, Chun K. .
CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 40 (12) :950-958
[23]   Predictive Power of a Radiomic Signature Based on 18F-FDG PET/CT Images for EGFR Mutational Status in NSCLC [J].
Li, Xiaofeng ;
Yin, Guotao ;
Zhang, Yufan ;
Dai, Dong ;
Liu, Jianjing ;
Chen, Peihe ;
Zhu, Lei ;
Ma, Wenjuan ;
Xu, Wengui .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
[24]   Primary metabolic tumor volume from 18F-FDG PET/CT associated with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in lung adenocarcinoma patients [J].
Liao, Xuhe ;
Cui, Yonggang ;
Chen, Xueqi ;
Di, Lijuan ;
Tong, Zhenghao ;
Liu, Meng ;
Wang, Rongfu .
NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 41 (11) :1210-1217
[25]   The role of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) measured by [18F] FDG PET/CT in predicting EGFR gene mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer [J].
Liu, Ao ;
Han, Anqin ;
Zhu, Hui ;
Ma, Li ;
Huang, Yong ;
Li, Minghuan ;
Jin, Feng ;
Yang, Qiuan ;
Yu, Jinming .
ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (20) :33736-33744
[26]   Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting EGFR mutations and positive ALK expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of 849 Chinese patients [J].
Lv, Zhilei ;
Fan, Jinshuo ;
Xu, Juanjuan ;
Wu, Feng ;
Huang, Qi ;
Guo, Mengfei ;
Liao, Tingting ;
Liu, Shuqing ;
Lan, Xiaoli ;
Liao, Shanshan ;
Geng, Wei ;
Jin, Yang .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 (05) :735-750
[27]   18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI diagnostic performance in M staging for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Machado Medeiros, Tassia ;
Altmayer, Stephan ;
Watte, Guilherme ;
Zanon, Matheus ;
Basso Dias, Adriano ;
Henz Concatto, Natalia ;
Hoefel Paes, Julia ;
Mattiello, Rita ;
de Souza Santos, Francisco ;
Mohammed, Tan-Lucien ;
Verma, Nupur ;
Hochhegger, Bruno .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (07) :3641-3649
[28]   Role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Predicting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [J].
Mak, Raymond H. ;
Digumarthy, Subba R. ;
Muzikansky, Alona ;
Engelman, Jeffrey A. ;
Shepard, Jo-Anne O. ;
Choi, Noah C. ;
Sequist, Lecia V. .
ONCOLOGIST, 2011, 16 (03) :319-326
[29]   Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations [J].
McLoughlin, Erin M. ;
Gentzler, Ryan D. .
THORACIC SURGERY CLINICS, 2020, 30 (02) :127-136
[30]   Prediction of EGFR and KRAS mutation in non-small cell lung cancer using quantitative 18F FDG-PET/CT metrics [J].
Minamimoto, Ryogo ;
Jamali, Mehran ;
Gevaert, Olivier ;
Echegaray, Sebastian ;
Khuong, Amanda ;
Hoang, Chuong D. ;
Shrager, Joseph B. ;
Plevritis, Sylvia K. ;
Rubin, Daniel L. ;
Leung, Ann N. ;
Napel, Sandy ;
Quon, Andrew .
ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (32) :52792-52801