The potential of critical race theory in decolonizing university curricula

被引:31
作者
McLaughlin, Juliana [1 ]
Whatman, Susan [2 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Oodgeroo Unit, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Sch Educ & Profess Studies, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
indigenous knowledge; critical race theory; decolonizing; curriculum; tertiary education; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1080/02188791.2011.621243
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper critiques our experiences as non-Indigenous Australian educators of working with numerous embedding Indigenous perspectives curricular projects at an Australian university. Reporting on these project outcomes alone, while useful in identifying limitations, does not illustrate ways in which future embedding and decolonizing projects can persist and evolve. Deeper analysis is required of the ways in which Indigenous knowledge and perspectives are perceived, and what "embedding" Indigenous Knowledge in university curricula truly means to various educational stakeholders. To achieve a deeper analysis and propose ways to invigorate the continuing decolonization of Australian university curricula, this paper critically interrogates the methodology and conceptualization of Indigenous knowledge in embedding Indigenous perspectives (EIP) in the university curriculum using tenets of critical race theory. Accordingly, we conduct this analysis from the standpoint that EIP should not subscribe to the luxury of independence of scholarship from politics and activism. The learning objective is to create a space to legitimize politics in the intellectual/academic realm. We conclude by arguing that critical race theory's emancipatory, future and action-oriented goals for curricula would enhance effective and sustainable embedding initiatives, and ultimately, preventing such initiatives from returning to the status quo.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 377
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Agrawal A, 1996, INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE, V4
  • [2] Agrawal A., 1995, Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor, V3, DOI [10.7454/ai.v0i55.3331, DOI 10.7454/AI.V0I55.3331]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, IMPR IND OUTC ENH IN
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2007, SOVEREIGN SUBJECTS I
  • [5] Battiste M., 2000, RECLAIMING INDIGENOU
  • [6] BROWN V BOARD OF EDUCATION AND THE INTEREST-CONVERGENCE DILEMMA
    BELL, DA
    [J]. HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1980, 93 (03) : 518 - 533
  • [7] Bell Derrick., 2004, SILENT COVENANTS BRO
  • [8] Carolissen R., 2010, WORLD COUNC COMP ED
  • [9] Carpenter B., 2002, ANN C AUSTR ASS RES
  • [10] DEEWR (Department of Employment Education and Workplace R elations, 2009, CLOS GAP IND AUSTR