Consideration of material variability in reliability analysis of FRP strengthened bridge decks

被引:60
作者
Atadero, R [1 ]
Lee, L [1 ]
Karbhari, VM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Struct Engn, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
concrete; fiber reinforced polymers; rehabilitation; reliability; wet layup; statistical distributions; materials variability;
D O I
10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.003
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites are increasingly being used in the rehabilitation of deteriorating and under-strength concrete bridge decks and girders in the form of externally bonded reinforcement. The wet layup process is often used due to its inherent flexibility and ease of use in the field. However, this process, especially in uncontrolled field conditions, can result in significant variability in resulting FRP properties which can consequently cause a reduction in reliability of the rehabilitated structure. This paper reports on an investigation into variability accrued through the use of wet layup of carbon fabric as externally bonded reinforcement for the rehabilitation of the decks of a bridge. Variation in material properties is assessed through testing of an extensive set of process panels fabricated at the same time as the rehabilitation, and under the same conditions. Statistical analysis is conducted on the data sets to assess the variation and the goodness-of-fit using a number of commonly used distributions. Results are used in a Monte-Carlo simulation to assess reliability, and variation thereof depending on the statistical descriptions used for steel, concrete, and FRP, and results are compared using different methods for the computation of beta. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 443
页数:14
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] *AM WOOD COUNC, 2001, LOAD RES FACT DES LR
  • [2] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2002, STAND SPEC HIGHW BRI
  • [3] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Load and Resistance Factor, 1998, AASHTO LRFD BRIDG DE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1999, 368 NCHRP
  • [5] Barker R.M., 1997, DESIGN HIGHWAY BRIDG
  • [6] LEE L, 2003, P INT S JAP CONCR I, P9
  • [7] Lee LS, 2003, STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING AND INTELLIGENT INFRASTRUCTURE, VOLS 1 AND 2, P1215
  • [8] MACGREGOR JG, 1997, REINFORCED CONCRETE, P39
  • [9] Madsen H. O, 1986, METHODS STRUCTURAL R
  • [10] Melchers R.E., 1987, Structural reliability analysis and prediction