How to Strengthen Innovation Support Services in Agriculture with Regard to Multi-Stakeholder Approaches

被引:36
|
作者
Faure, Guy [1 ,2 ]
Knierim, Andrea [3 ]
Koutsouris, Alex [4 ]
Ndah, Hycenth Tim [3 ,5 ]
Audouin, Sarah [2 ,6 ]
Zarokosta, Elena [4 ]
Wielinga, Eelke [7 ]
Triomphe, Bernard [2 ,8 ]
Mathe, Syndhia [2 ,9 ]
Temple, Ludovic [1 ,2 ]
Heanue, Kevin [10 ]
机构
[1] CIRAD, UMR Innovat, Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Innovat,Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
[4] Agr Univ Athens, Athens, Greece
[5] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Muncheberg, Germany
[6] CIRAD, UMR Innovat, Antananarivo, Madagascar
[7] Link Consult, Muncheberg, Germany
[8] CIRAD, UMR Innovat, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[9] CIRAD, UMR Innovat, Yaounde, Cameroon
[10] TEAGASC, Irish Agr & Food Dev Author, Dublin, Ireland
来源
JOURNAL OF INNOVATION ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT | 2019年 / 28期
关键词
Innovation System; Agricultural Service; Phase of Innovation; Brokering; Innovation Support Service; ADVISORY SERVICES; MANAGEMENT; PERSPECTIVE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.3917/jie.028.0145
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The new EU agricultural policy aims to strengthen actors' capacities for innovation by taking into account the complexity of innovation processes. This paper characterizes the key innovation support services (ISS) that support actors in innovating. In the EU AgriSpin project, we analyzed 57 case studies describing innovation processes. We used a common grid to characterize ISS. Our results show that ISS depends on the phase of the innovation. During the initial phases, there is a need for innovative support services (e.g. network building, support for the innovator). In the latter phases, there is a need for more conventional services (e.g. training, credit) at farm, value chain and territory level. Brokering functions and new services are key to supporting actors to innovate by facilitating interactions for the co-production of knowledge, co-design of technologies, and identification of new institutional arrangements.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 169
页数:25
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Effects of multi-stakeholder platforms on multi-stakeholder innovation networks: Implications for research for development interventions targeting innovations at scale
    Sartas, Murat
    Schut, Marc
    Hermans, Frans
    van Asten, Piet
    Leeuwis, Cees
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [2] Supporting innovation for tourism development through multi-stakeholder approaches: Experiences from Africa
    Carlisle, Sheena
    Kunc, Martin
    Jones, Eleri
    Tiffin, Scott
    TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2013, 35 : 59 - 69
  • [3] How entrepreneurial orientation drives farmers' innovation differential in Ugandan coffee multi-stakeholder platforms
    Barzola Iza, Carlos Luis
    Dentoni, Domenico
    JOURNAL OF AGRIBUSINESS IN DEVELOPING AND EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2020, 10 (05) : 629 - 650
  • [4] Navigating psychological barriers in agricultural innovation adoption: A multi-stakeholder perspective
    Chindasombatcharoen, Nopparuj
    Tsolakis, Naoum
    Kumar, Mukesh
    O'Sullivan, Eoin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 475
  • [5] A multi-stakeholder decision support system for local neighbourhood energy planning
    Hettinga, Sanne
    Nijkamp, Peter
    Scholten, Henk
    ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 116 : 277 - 288
  • [6] Sustainable business model innovation: The role of boundary work for multi-stakeholder alignment
    Velter, M. G. E.
    Bitzer, V.
    Bocken, N. M. P.
    Kemp, R.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 247
  • [7] Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: Opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling
    Hermans, Frans
    Sartas, Murat
    Van Schagen, Boudy
    van Asten, Piet
    Schut, Marc
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02):
  • [8] Multi-Stakeholder Innovation in Smart City Discourse: Quadruple Helix Thinking in the Age of "Platforms"
    Borghys, Koen
    van der Graaf, Shenja
    Walravens, Nils
    Van Compernolle, Mathias
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES, 2020, 2
  • [9] How to develop higher education curricula towards employability? A multi-stakeholder approach
    Olo, Daniela
    Correia, Leonida
    Rego, Conceicao
    EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2022, 64 (01): : 89 - 106
  • [10] How to overcome barriers limiting LCA adoption? The role of a collaborative and multi-stakeholder approach
    Testa, Francesco
    Tessitore, Sara
    Buttol, Patrizia
    Iraldo, Fabio
    Cortesi, Sara
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2022, 27 (07) : 944 - 958