Clinical Benefit and Expedited Approval of Cancer Drugs in the United States, European Union, Switzerland, Japan, Canada, and Australia

被引:22
|
作者
Hwang, Thomas J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kesselheim, Aaron S. [3 ,4 ]
Tibau, Ariadna [5 ,6 ]
Lee, ChangWon C. [3 ,4 ]
Vokinger, Kerstin N. [3 ,4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Lank Ctr Genitourinary Canc, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Canc Innovat & Regulat Initiat, 45 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Urol Surg, 45 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Program Regulat Therapeut & Law Portal, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Dept Oncol, Inst Invest Biomed St Pau, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Univ Zurich, Inst Law, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
ESMO-MAGNITUDE; THERAPEUTICS; COST; ASCO;
D O I
10.1200/OP.21.00909
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Regulatory agencies have sought to speed up the review of new cancer medicines and reduce delays in approval between countries. We examined trends in regulatory review times and association with clinical benefit for new cancer medicines in six jurisdictions: United States (Food and Drug Administration [FDA]), European Union (European Medicines Agency [EMA]), Switzerland (Swissmedic), Japan (Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency [PMDA]), Canada (Health Canada), and Australia (Therapeutic Goods Administration). METHODS: We studied all new cancer drugs approved in the six aforementioned jurisdictions from 2007 to 2020. We extracted all applicable expedited programs, total regulatory review times, and, for drugs first approved by the FDA, times to subsequent regulatory approval. Clinical benefit was assessed using the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale value framework and ASCO-Cancer Research Committee's targets. Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare total review times for high versus low clinical benefit drugs. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty eight drugs received initial approval in at least one of the six included jurisdictions. Most drugs approved by the FDA (91%) and Health Canada (59%) qualified for at least one expedited program within those jurisdictions, compared with 46% of EMA approvals and 18% of PMDA approvals. The FDA was the first regulator to approve 102 (80%) drugs. Delays in submission accounted for a median of 20.2% (EMA) to 83.8% (PMDA) of the time to subsequent approval. There was no association between high clinical benefit and shorter total review times. CONCLUSION: Most new cancer therapies were approved first by the FDA, and delays in submission of regulatory applications accounted for substantial delays in approving cancer drugs in other countries. Regulators should prioritize faster review for drugs with high clinical benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / E1532
页数:12
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Clinical benefit of cancer drugs approved in Switzerland 2010-2019
    Adam, Roman
    Tibau, Ariadna
    Molto Valiente, Consolacion
    Seruga, Bostjan
    Ocana, Alberto
    Amir, Eitan
    Templeton, Arnoud J.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (06):
  • [2] Health Technology Assessment of Cancer Drugs in Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia: Should the United States Take Notice?
    Dranitsaris, George
    Papadopoulos, George
    APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2015, 13 (03) : 291 - 302
  • [3] Twelve years of European cancer drug approval-a systematic investigation of the 'magnitude of clinical benefit'
    Groessmann, N.
    Wolf, S.
    Rothschedl, E.
    Wild, C.
    ESMO OPEN, 2021, 6 (03)
  • [4] Current monitoring and treatment of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease: a survey of physicians in Japan, the United States, and the European Union
    Takizawa, Ayako
    Kamita, Mitsutoyo
    Kondoh, Yasuhiro
    Bando, Masashi
    Kuwana, Masataka
    Inoue, Yoshikazu
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2021, 37 (02) : 327 - 339
  • [5] Assessing the benefit of cancer drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency using the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale over time
    Thomson, Sasha
    Witzke, Noah
    Gyawali, Bishal
    Santos, Seanthel Delos
    Udayakumar, Suji
    Cardone, Claudia
    Cheung, Matthew C.
    Chan, Kelvin K. W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 150 : 203 - 210
  • [6] Energy system transitions and low-carbon pathways in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, EU-28, India, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russia and the United States
    Fragkos, Panagiotis
    van Soest, Heleen Laura
    Schaeffer, Roberto
    Reedman, Luke
    Koberle, Alexandre C.
    Macaluso, Nick
    Evangelopoulou, Stavroula
    De Vita, Alessia
    Sha, Fu
    Qimin, Chai
    Kejun, Jiang
    Mathur, Ritu
    Shekhar, Swapnil
    Dewi, Retno Gumilang
    Diego, Silva Herran
    Oshiro, Ken
    Fujimori, Shinichiro
    Park, Chan
    Safonov, George
    Iyer, Gokul
    ENERGY, 2021, 216
  • [7] Clinical benefit, reimbursement outcomes, and prices of FDA-approved cancer drugs reviewed through Project Orbis in the USA, Canada, England, and Scotland: a retrospective, comparative analysis
    Jenei, Kristina
    Gentilini, Arianna
    Haslam, Alyson
    Prasad, Vinay
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2024, 25 (08) : 979 - 988