Dynamic adjustment of lexical processing in the lexical decision task: Cross-trial sequence effects

被引:4
作者
Balota, David A. [1 ]
Aschenbrenner, Andrew J. [1 ]
Yap, Melvin J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ St Louis, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Psychol, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Lexical decision; Sequential effects; STIMULUS QUALITY; WORD-FREQUENCY; MENTAL PROCESSES; HISTORY; MODEL; RECOGNITION; MODULATION; ACTIVATION; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1080/17470218.2016.1240814
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
There has been growing interest in dynamic changes in the lexical processing system across trials, which have typically been assessed via linear mixed effect modelling. In the current study, we explore the influence of previous trial lexicality and previous trial perceptual degradation on the effect of lexicality and degradation on the current trial. The results of analyses of three datasets (two previously published studies and a new study) provide evidence for a robust four-way interaction among previous trial lexicality and degradation and current trial lexicality and degradation effects. Discussion emphasizes how priming of relevant dimensions (clear vs. degraded or word vs. nonword) within the experimental context modulates the influence of degradation on the current trial as a function of lexicality. These results suggest that in lexical decision there are robust lingering effects of the previous stimulus and response that carry over to the current stimulus and response, and participants cannot tune task-related systems to only the present trial. Importantly, although these complex relationships are theoretically important regarding lexical and decision level processes, these complexities also reinforce Keith Rayner's emphasis on on-line eye-tracking measures during reading as the most straightforward window into word-level processes engaged during reading.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 45
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Interactive Effects of Working Memory and Trial History on Stroop Interference in Cognitively Healthy Aging [J].
Aschenbrenner, Andrew J. ;
Balota, David A. .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2015, 30 (01) :1-8
[2]   Additive Effects of Word Frequency and Stimulus Quality: The Influence of Trial History and Data Transformations [J].
Balota, David A. ;
Aschenbrenner, Andrew J. ;
Yap, Melvin J. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2013, 39 (05) :1563-1571
[3]   Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J].
Barr, Dale J. ;
Levy, Roger ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Tily, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) :255-278
[4]  
Bates D., 2015, Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.04967, DOI DOI 10.18637/JSS.V067.I01
[5]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[6]   VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION - A MULTISTAGE ACTIVATION MODEL [J].
BOROWSKY, R ;
BESNER, D .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1993, 19 (04) :813-840
[7]   Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas [J].
Brysbaert, Marc ;
Warriner, Amy Beth ;
Kuperman, Victor .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2014, 46 (03) :904-911
[8]   Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English [J].
Brysbaert, Marc ;
New, Boris .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) :977-990
[9]   How to Say "No" to a Nonword: A Leaky Competing Accumulator Model of Lexical Decision [J].
Dufau, Stephane ;
Grainger, Jonathan ;
Ziegler, Johannes C. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2012, 38 (04) :1117-1128
[10]   OPTIMIZING THE USE OF INFORMATION - STRATEGIC CONTROL OF ACTIVATION OF RESPONSES [J].
GRATTON, G ;
COLES, MGH ;
DONCHIN, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1992, 121 (04) :480-506