Short-Term Adaptation of Accommodative Responses in Myopes Fitted With Multifocal Contact Lenses

被引:15
|
作者
Ozkan, Jerome [1 ,2 ]
Fedtke, Cathleen [1 ]
Chung, Jiyoon [1 ]
Thomas, Varghese [1 ]
Bakaraju, Ravi Chandra [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Brien Holden Vis Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Optometry & Vis Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE | 2018年 / 44卷
关键词
Accommodation; Multifocal contact lenses; Myopia; Adaptation; VISION; PROGRESSION; ABERRATION; ONSET; REFRACTION; FACILITY; EYE;
D O I
10.1097/ICL.0000000000000299
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objectives: To investigate whether adaptation of accommodative responses occurred in non-presbyopic myopes fitted with four multifocal contact lens (MFCL) designs. Methods: Prospective, subject-masked clinical investigation comprising 40 experienced myopic lens wearers (18-25 years) fitted bilaterally with single-vision (SV) control lens (Air Optix Aqua [Alcon, Fort Worth, TX]) and randomized to two of four test MFCL (Proclear MFCL [Distance and Near] [CooperVision, Pleasanton, CA], Air Optix Aqua MFCL, Pure-vision MFCL [Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY]). Lenses were dispensed on a daily wear basis and worn for a minimum of 8 (maximum 14) days over three assessment visits, with a 1-week wash out between stages. Paraxial curvature matched spherical equivalent (M) was measured with lenses on eye using the BHVI-EyeMapper with an internal movable fixation target positioned at target vergences of +1.00 diopter (D) (fogging) and -2.00 to -5.00 in 1.00 D steps (accommodative stimuli). Accommodative facility was assessed by several flips of +/- 2.00 D/min (cycles/min) at 33 cm and horizontal phoria with a Howell phoria card at distance (3 m) and near (33 cm). Results: For center-distance MFCL (Proclear D), the spherical equivalent (M) at all near vergences became significantly more negative at the follow-up visits compared with the dispensing visit (P<0.029). For all center-near MFCLs and SV lens, M remained invariant during the adaptation period, however (P >= 0.267). At distance, M became significantly less minus with Air Optix Aqua MFCL over time (P = 0.049). Accommodative facility increased over the three assessment visits for participants wearing Air Optix Aqua SV, Air Optix Aqua MFCL, and PureVision MFCL (P = 0.003). Distance and near horizontal phoria remained stable over the three assessment visits for all lens types (P >= 0.181). Conclusions: Adaptation differences were not consistently found for static accommodative measures gauged by M, as measured with lenses on eye, and phoria but were found in dynamic measures (facility), perhaps indicating some learning effects. Accommodative adaptation seems unlikely to occur with long-term MFCL in non-presbyopes.
引用
收藏
页码:S30 / S37
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Short-term adaptation of accommodative lag, facility and phoria in myopes fitted with multifocal contact lenses
    Ozkan, Jerome
    Bakaraju, Ravi
    Fedtke, Cathleen
    Chung, Jiyoon
    Ehrmann, Klaus
    Falk, Darrin
    Ho, Arthur
    Holden, Brien
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [2] Predicting Short-term Performance of Multifocal Contact Lenses
    Diec, Jennie
    Tilia, Daniel
    Naduvilath, Thomas
    Bakaraju, Ravi C.
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2017, 43 (06): : 340 - 345
  • [3] Changes in Accommodative Responses with Multifocal Contact Lenses: A Pilot Study
    Madrid-Costa, David
    Ruiz-Alcocer, Javier
    Radhakrishnan, Hema
    Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa
    Montes-Mico, Robert
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2011, 88 (11) : 1309 - 1316
  • [4] Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function?
    Jimenez, Raimundo
    Martinez-Almeida, Loreto
    Salas, Carlos
    Ortiz, Carolina
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 249 (06) : 925 - 935
  • [5] The efficacy of multifocal soft contact lenses for the alleviation of asthenopic symptoms in myopes with accommodative lag
    Ong, Alex C. H.
    Cruickshank, Fiona E.
    Sheppard, Amy L.
    Davies, Leon N.
    CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2022, 45 (02)
  • [6] Visual quality of juvenile myopes wearing multifocal soft contact lenses
    Huang, Xiaopeng
    Wang, Feifu
    Lin, Zhiyi
    He, Yifan
    Wen, Shuyun
    Zhou, Ling
    Lu, Fan
    Jiang, Jun
    EYE AND VISION, 2020, 7 (01)
  • [7] Accommodative Lag, Facility and Phoria with Multifocal Contact Lenses
    Chung, Jiyoon
    Bakaraju, Ravi
    Fedtke, Cathleen
    Ozkan, Jerome
    Ehrmann, Klaus
    Falk, Darrin
    Ho, Arthur
    Holden, Brien
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [8] Short-term visual performance of soft multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia
    Sha, Jennifer
    Bakaraju, Ravi C.
    Tilia, Daniel
    Chung, Jiyoon
    Delaney, Shona
    Munro, Anna
    Ehrmann, Klaus
    Thomas, Varghese
    Holden, Brien A.
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2016, 79 (02) : 73 - 77
  • [9] The effect of concentric and aspheric multifocal soft contact lenses on binocular vision in young adult myopes
    Schmid, Katrina L.
    Gifford, Kate L.
    Atchison, David A.
    CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2023, 46 (01)
  • [10] Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function?
    Raimundo Jiménez
    Loreto Martínez-Almeida
    Carlos Salas
    Carolina Ortíz
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2011, 249 : 925 - 935