When is it valid to assume that heat flux is parallel to B?

被引:3
作者
Goldston, Robert J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Plasma Phys Lab, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.11.005
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
It is frequently assumed that heat flow in the plasma scrape-off-layer is everywhere parallel to B, due to the strong anisotropy in electron thermal conductivity. This assumption is convenient but paradoxical. Here are examined three situations where this assumption has sometimes been applied: (1) extrapolating from midplane T-e(R) measurements to divertor heat flux profile, (2) determining the location of the separatrix from measured midplane T-e(R), combined with total heat flux leaving the plasma, and (3) predicting the heat flux to plasma-facing components in the scrape-off-layer of diverted plasmas. Numerical solution of the anisotropic, nonlinear heat equation suggests that the first application is poor, the second well justified, and the third far from accurate. Additional plasma physics effects may mitigate these results, but the simple assumption of dominant parallel heat flow due to anisotropy in electron thermal conductivity is not supported in many important cases. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S566 / S569
页数:4
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]   Downstream heat flux profile versus midplane T profile in tokamaks [J].
Goldston, Robert J. .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2010, 17 (01)
[2]   Analytic solutions of the two-dimensional transport equation in scrape-off-layer plasmas [J].
Itoh, SI ;
Yagi, M ;
Itoh, K .
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 1996, 38 (02) :155-164
[3]   Multi-machine comparisons of H-mode separatrix densities and edge profile behaviour in the ITPA SOL and Divertor Physics Topical Group [J].
Kallenbach, A ;
Asakura, N ;
Kirk, A ;
Korotkov, A ;
Mahdavi, MA ;
Mossessian, D ;
Porter, GD .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 2005, 337 (1-3) :381-385
[4]   THE NATURE OF PLASMA FLUXES TO SURFACES NEARLY TANGENTIAL TO THE MAGNETIC-FIELD [J].
STANGEBY, PC ;
PITCHER, CS ;
ELDER, JD .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 1992, 32 (12) :2079-2089