Energy Related CO2 Emissions before and after the Financial Crisis

被引:39
作者
Sadorsky, Perry [1 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Schulich Sch Business, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
关键词
CO2; emissions; logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI); decomposition; decoupling; financial crisis; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; DECOUPLING ANALYSIS; DRIVING FORCES; LMDI APPROACH; EFFICIENCY; INTENSITY; DRIVERS; CHINA;
D O I
10.3390/su12093867
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The 2008-2009 financial crisis, often referred to as the Great Recession, presented one of the greatest challenges to economies since the Great Depression of the 1930s. Before the financial crisis, and in response to the Kyoto Protocol, many countries were making great strides in increasing energy efficiency, reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emission intensity and reducing their emissions of CO2. During the financial crisis, CO2 emissions declined in response to a decrease in economic activity. The focus of this research is to study how energy related CO2 emissions and their driving factors after the financial crisis compare to the period before the financial crisis. The logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) method is used to decompose changes in country level CO2 emissions into contributing factors representing carbon intensity, energy intensity, economic activity, and population. The analysis is conducted for a group of 19 major countries (G19) which form the core of the G20. For the G19, as a group, the increase in CO2 emissions post-financial crisis was less than the increase in CO2 emissions pre-financial crisis. China is the only BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) country to record changes in CO2 emissions, carbon intensity and energy intensity in the post-financial crisis period that were lower than their respective values in the pre-financial crisis period. Compared to the pre-financial crisis period, Germany, France, and Italy also recorded lower CO2 emissions, carbon intensity and energy intensity in the post-financial crisis period. Germany and Great Britain are the only two countries to record negative changes in CO2 emissions over both periods. Continued improvements in reducing CO2 emissions, carbon intensity and energy intensity are hard to come by, as only four out of nineteen countries were able to achieve this. Most countries are experiencing weak decoupling between CO2 emissions and GDP. Germany and France are the two countries that stand out as leaders among the G19.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 65 条
[11]   In the transition of energy systems: What lessons can be learnt from the German achievement? [J].
Cheung, Grace ;
Davies, Peter J. ;
Bassen, Alexander .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 132 :633-646
[12]   Understanding the Subprime Mortgage Crisis [J].
Demyanyk, Yuliya ;
Van Hemert, Otto .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2011, 24 (06) :1848-1880
[13]   Are the G20 economies making enough progress to meet their NDC targets? [J].
den Elzen, Michel ;
Kuramochi, Takeshi ;
Hoehne, Niklas ;
Cantzler, Jasmin ;
Esmeijer, Kendall ;
Fekete, Hanna ;
Fransen, Taryn ;
Keramidas, Kimon ;
Roelfsema, Mark ;
Sha, Fu ;
van Soest, Heleen ;
Vandyck, Toon .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 126 :238-250
[14]   Do drivers of CO2 emission growth alter overtime and by the stage of economic development? [J].
Dong, Kangyin ;
Hochman, Gal ;
Timilsina, Govinda R. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 140 (140)
[16]   The Next Generation of the Penn World Table [J].
Feenstra, Robert C. ;
Inklaar, Robert ;
Timmer, Marcel P. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (10) :3150-3182
[17]  
Giedraitis V., 2010, Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Businesses, V4, P7
[18]   Drivers of stagnating global carbon intensity of electricity and the way forward [J].
Goh, Tian ;
Ang, B. W. ;
Su, Bin ;
Wang, H. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 113 :149-156
[19]  
Government of Canada, CAN PART 2019 G20 SU
[20]  
Gupta A., 2016, Handbook of Environmental and Sustainable Finance, P3, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-803615-0.00001-7