Energy Related CO2 Emissions before and after the Financial Crisis

被引:39
作者
Sadorsky, Perry [1 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Schulich Sch Business, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
关键词
CO2; emissions; logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI); decomposition; decoupling; financial crisis; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; DECOUPLING ANALYSIS; DRIVING FORCES; LMDI APPROACH; EFFICIENCY; INTENSITY; DRIVERS; CHINA;
D O I
10.3390/su12093867
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The 2008-2009 financial crisis, often referred to as the Great Recession, presented one of the greatest challenges to economies since the Great Depression of the 1930s. Before the financial crisis, and in response to the Kyoto Protocol, many countries were making great strides in increasing energy efficiency, reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emission intensity and reducing their emissions of CO2. During the financial crisis, CO2 emissions declined in response to a decrease in economic activity. The focus of this research is to study how energy related CO2 emissions and their driving factors after the financial crisis compare to the period before the financial crisis. The logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) method is used to decompose changes in country level CO2 emissions into contributing factors representing carbon intensity, energy intensity, economic activity, and population. The analysis is conducted for a group of 19 major countries (G19) which form the core of the G20. For the G19, as a group, the increase in CO2 emissions post-financial crisis was less than the increase in CO2 emissions pre-financial crisis. China is the only BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) country to record changes in CO2 emissions, carbon intensity and energy intensity in the post-financial crisis period that were lower than their respective values in the pre-financial crisis period. Compared to the pre-financial crisis period, Germany, France, and Italy also recorded lower CO2 emissions, carbon intensity and energy intensity in the post-financial crisis period. Germany and Great Britain are the only two countries to record negative changes in CO2 emissions over both periods. Continued improvements in reducing CO2 emissions, carbon intensity and energy intensity are hard to come by, as only four out of nineteen countries were able to achieve this. Most countries are experiencing weak decoupling between CO2 emissions and GDP. Germany and France are the two countries that stand out as leaders among the G19.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 65 条
[2]   The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (07) :867-871
[3]   Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (09) :1131-1139
[4]  
[Anonymous], THE PARIS AGREEMENT
[5]  
Aruga Kentaka, 2020, Energy Transitions, V4, P91, DOI 10.1007/s41825-020-00025-y
[6]   Aftermath of Fukushima: Avoiding another major nuclear disaster [J].
Behling, Noriko ;
Williams, Mark C. ;
Behling, Thomas G. ;
Managi, Shunsuke .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 126 :411-420
[7]   Changes in the GHG emission intensity in EU-15: Lessons from a decomposition analysis [J].
Bhattacharyya, Subhes C. ;
Matsumura, Wataru .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (08) :3315-3322
[8]  
CarbonBrief, AN WHY UKS CO2 EM HA
[9]   Key Drivers for Cooperation toward Sustainable Development and the Management of CO2 Emissions: Comparative Analysis of Six Northeast Asian Countries [J].
Chapman, Andrew ;
Fujii, Hidemichi ;
Managi, Shunsuke .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (01)
[10]   Decomposition and decoupling analysis of CO2 emissions in OECD [J].
Chen, Jiandong ;
Wang, Ping ;
Cui, Lianbiao ;
Huang, Shuo ;
Song, Malin .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 231 :937-950