Wave-energy plant site and converter type selection using multi-criteria decision making

被引:4
|
作者
Ergul, Engin Ufuk [1 ]
Ozbek, Tayfun [2 ]
机构
[1] Amasya Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Fac Engn, Amasya, Turkey
[2] Amasya Univ, Inst Sci, Dept Renewable Energy & Applicat, Amasya, Turkey
关键词
energy; renewable energy; site investigation; FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD; BLACK-SEA; ALTERNATIVES; PRIORITIZATION; RESOURCES; ECONOMICS; LOCATION; HINDCAST; SYSTEMS; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1680/jener.21.00087
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The demand for renewable energy sources is increasing rapidly due to the increase in energy demand, the possible decline of fossil fuels in the coming years, climate change and environmental pollution. Several studies have been carried out on the potential of wave energy and many wave-energy converters (WECs) have been developed. Although there is potential for wave energy in Turkey, wave energy is hardly exploited. The main purpose of this study was to determine the most appropriate site and converter type for a wave-energy power plant planned to be built in Turkey. For this purpose, a two-phased multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) structure is constructed. Analytic network process (ANP) and fuzzy technique for order preference by similar to ideal solution (Topsis) are selected as MCDM methods. Five cities located on the Black Sea coast that have high wave-energy potential are selected as alternatives for the installation site of the wave-energy power plant. In the first phase, Sinop is determined by ANP as the most suitable site for a wave-energy power plant. In the second phase, the most suitable of the five alternative WECs, to be installed at Sinop, is determined by fuzzy Topsis to be Oyster.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 63
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY SELECTION USING Z-NUMBERS IN UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENT
    Chatterjee, Kajal
    Kar, Samarjit
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2018, 24 (02) : 739 - 764
  • [2] A review on the applications of multi-criteria decision-making approaches for power plant site selection
    Khanlari, Amir
    Alhuyi Nazari, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2022, 147 (07) : 4473 - 4489
  • [3] A review on the applications of multi-criteria decision-making approaches for power plant site selection
    Amir Khanlari
    Mohammad Alhuyi Nazari
    Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2022, 147 : 4473 - 4489
  • [4] Site selection of wind farms using GIS and multi-criteria decision making method in Wafangdian, China
    Xu, Ye
    Li, Ye
    Zheng, Lijun
    Cui, Liang
    Li, Sha
    Li, Wei
    Cai, Yanpeng
    ENERGY, 2020, 207
  • [5] The Selection of Skylight Type for a Certain Building Using Evaluation Criteria and the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method
    Bagdonas, Vytenis
    Dauksys, Mindaugas
    Mockiene, Jurate
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (12)
  • [6] A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Energy Storage Technology Selection Based on Demand
    Qie, Xiaotong
    Zhang, Rui
    Hu, Yanyong
    Sun, Xialing
    Chen, Xue
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (20)
  • [7] Multi-criteria decision-making in the location selection for a solar PV power plant using AHP
    Ozdemir, Seda
    Sahin, Gokhan
    MEASUREMENT, 2018, 129 : 218 - 226
  • [8] Emergency logistics centers site selection by multi-criteria decision-making and GIS
    Feng, Zengxi
    Li, Gangting
    Wang, Wenjing
    Zhang, Lutong
    Xiang, Weipeng
    He, Xin
    Zhang, Maoqiang
    Wei, Na
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2023, 96
  • [9] Combining GIS and fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making for water catchment drilling site selection
    Boukrentach, Hafida
    Benali, Abdelmadjid
    Dekkiche, Hicham
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2017, 10 (24)
  • [10] AN INTEGRATED MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODOLOGY BASED ON TYPE-2 FUZZY SETS FOR SELECTION AMONG ENERGY ALTERNATIVES IN TURKEY
    Erdogan, M.
    Kaya, I.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2015, 12 (01): : 1 - 25