A Simple Evaluation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Tunnel Position The Inclination Angle and Femoral Tunnel Angle

被引:79
作者
Illingworth, Kenneth David [1 ]
Hensler, Daniel [1 ]
Working, Zachary Mark [1 ]
Macalena, Jeffrey Alexander [1 ]
Tashman, Scott [1 ]
Fu, Freddie H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
femoral tunnel angle; inclination angle; anatomic ACL; 3D CT; tibial tunnel-independent drilling; transtibial drilling; ACL MRI; 3-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RECONSTRUCTION; KNEE; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1177/0363546511420128
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Postoperative determination of tunnel position after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can be challenging. Hypothesis: The femoral tunnel angle and inclination angle are reliable methods for evaluating tunnel position after ACL reconstruction while aiding in determining whether an ACL reconstruction falls outside an anatomic range as defined on 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT). Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Fifty patients were included who received single-bundle ACL reconstructions with postoperative flexion weightbearing radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and CT scans. Femoral tunnel angles were determined from posterior-to-anterior postoperative radiographs, and inclination angles were determined from sagittal MRI. The ACL reconstructions were grouped by surgical technique, transtibial (TT) or tibial tunnel independent (TTI), and as either falling inside or outside an anatomic range on 3D CT. Results: Patients with tunnel positions within an anatomic range, as previously defined, had a larger femoral tunnel angle (39.3 degrees +/- 4.2 degrees) and smaller inclination angle (49.5 degrees +/- 2.7 degrees) than patients who fell outside an anatomic range (17.2 degrees +/- 12.5 degrees and 62.3 degrees +/- 7.8 degrees, respectively) (P < .001). Patients in the TTI group had a larger femoral tunnel angle (37.6 degrees +/- 9.30 degrees) and smaller inclination angle (51.8 degrees +/- 6.5 degrees) than those in the TT group (14.2 degrees +/- 9.3 degrees and 63.5 degrees +/- 7.2 degrees, respectively) (P < .001). Posterior-to-anterior femoral tunnel position was negatively correlated with femoral tunnel angle (P < .001, r = .78) and positively correlated with inclination angle (P < .001, r = .74). Based on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, a femoral tunnel angle of 32.7 degrees (100% sensitivity and 85% specificity) and inclination angle of 55 degrees (100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity) were determined to distinguish ACL reconstructions that fell either within or outside an anatomic range on 3D CT. Conclusion: Femoral tunnel angle and inclination angle can be reliably determined from both posterior-to-anterior radiographs and sagittal MRI and provide a useful metric for characterizing femoral tunnel position.
引用
收藏
页码:2611 / 2618
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Femoral Tunnel Placement During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction An In Vivo Imaging Analysis Comparing Transtibial and 2-Incision Tibial Tunnel-Independent Techniques [J].
Abebe, Ermias S. ;
Moorman, C. T., III ;
Dziedzic, T. Scott ;
Spritzer, Charles E. ;
Cothran, R. Lee ;
Taylor, Dean C. ;
Garrett, William E., Jr. ;
DeFrate, Louis E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (10) :1904-1911
[2]  
Aglietti P, 1995, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, V3, P2, DOI 10.1007/BF01553517
[3]   Measurement of the graft angles for the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial technique using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in comparative study [J].
Ahn, Jin Hwan ;
Lee, Sang Hak ;
Yoo, Jae Chul ;
Ha, Hae Chan .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2007, 15 (11) :1293-1300
[4]   Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting [J].
Amis A.A. ;
Jakob R.P. .
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 1998, 6 (Suppl 1) :S2-S12
[5]   Single-incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: a cadaver study [J].
Arnold, MP ;
Kooloos, J ;
van Kampen, A .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2001, 9 (04) :194-199
[6]   Comparison of sagittal obliquity of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament with native anterior cruciate ligament using magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Ayerza, MA ;
Múscolo, DL ;
Costa-Paz, M ;
Makino, A ;
Rondón, L .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2003, 19 (03) :257-261
[7]   Transtibial Versus Anteromedial Portal Reaming in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Anatomic and Biomechanical Evaluation of Surgical Technique [J].
Bedi, Asheesh ;
Musahl, Volker ;
Steuber, Volker ;
Kendoff, Daniel ;
Choi, Dan ;
Allen, Answorth A. ;
Pearle, Andrew D. ;
Altchek, David W. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (03) :380-390
[8]   Effect of Tibial Tunnel Position on Stability of the Knee After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is the Tibial Tunnel Position Most Important? [J].
Bedi, Asheesh ;
Maak, Travis ;
Musahl, Volker ;
Citak, Musa ;
O'Loughlin, Padhraig F. ;
Choi, Daniel ;
Pearle, Andrew D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (02) :366-373
[9]   The "Footprint" Anterior Cruciate Ligament Technique: An Anatomic Approach to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction [J].
Bedi, Asheesh ;
Altchek, David W. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2009, 25 (10) :1128-1138
[10]  
Bernard M, 1997, AM J KNEE SURG, V10