A single blind, prospective, randomized trial comparing N-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (indermil) and sutures for skin closure in hand surgery

被引：46

作者：

Sinha, S ^{[1
]}

Naik, M ^{[1
]}

Wright, V ^{[1
]}

Timmons, J ^{[1
]}

Campbell, AC ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Monklands Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Airdrie, Scotland

来源：

JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME | 2001年 / 26卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1054/jhsb.2000.0572

中图分类号：

R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Fifty patients underwent a variety of hand operations and were randomized for wound closure either with tissue adhesive (Indermil) or sutures, The two treatment groups had similar demographic characteristics and similar outcomes at the 2 and 6 week postoperative assessments which mere performed by a designated tissue viability nurse blinded to the method of closure. Five minor mound dehiscences occurred: three in the adhesive group and two in the suture group. No infection occurred in either group, In conclusion, the study demonstrates tissue adhesive is as effective as suture in this type of hand surgery.

引用

页码：264 / 265

页数：2

共 13 条

[1] THE USE OF TISSUE ADHESION FOR TRAUMATIC LACERATION REPAIR IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT [J].