A comparison of four methods for assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA™) in paediatric patients

被引:78
作者
Lopez-Gil, M
Brimacombe, J
Keller, C
机构
[1] Maranon Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Reanimat, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Queensland, Cairns Base Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Leopold Franzens Univ, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care Med, Innsbruck, Austria
来源
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA | 2001年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
equipment : laryngeal mask airway; oropharyngeal leak pressure;
D O I
10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00649.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: This study compares four tests for assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA(TM)). We tested the hypothesis that the oropharyngeal leak pressure and interobserver reliability differs between tests. Methods: Eighty paralysed anaesthetized paediatric patients (weight 10-30 kg) were studied with the intracuff pressure set at 60 cmH(2)O. Four different oropharyngeal leak pressure tests were performed in random order on each patient by two observers blinded to each other's measurements. Test 1 involved detection of an audible noise. Test 2 involved detection of endtidal CO2 in the oral cavity. Test 3 involved observation of the aneroid manometer dial as the pressure increased and noting the airway pressure at which the dial reaches stability. Test 4 involved detection of an audible noise by neck stethoscopy. Results: The mean oropharyngeal leak pressure was 12.5 cmH(2)O and was similar between tests. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99 for all tests and was classed as excellent. Conclusions: We conclude that all four tests provide accurate and reliable information about oropharyngeal leak pressure in children.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 321
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   The effect of nitrous oxide diffusion on laryngeal mask airway cuff inflation in children [J].
Algren, JT ;
Gursoy, F ;
Johnson, TD ;
Skjonsby, BS .
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 8 (01) :31-36
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, The design and analysis of clinical experiments
[3]   A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway and cuffed oropharyngeal airway in anesthetized adult patients [J].
Brimacombe, JR ;
Brimacombe, JC ;
Berry, AM ;
Morris, R ;
Mecklem, D ;
Clarke, G ;
Barry, J ;
Kirk, T .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (01) :147-152
[4]  
Brimacombe JR, 1997, The Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Review and Practical Guide
[5]   Airway sealing pressures of the laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients [J].
Epstein, RH ;
Ferouz, F ;
Jenkins, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1996, 8 (02) :93-98
[6]   Positive pressure ventilation with the laryngeal mask airway in children [J].
Gursoy, F ;
Algren, JT ;
Skjonsby, BS .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (01) :33-38
[7]   Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients [J].
Keller, C ;
Brimacombe, JR ;
Keller, K ;
Morris, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (02) :286-287
[8]  
ROSNER B, 1995, FUNDAMENTALS BIOSTAT, P423