An ANP model for risk response assessment in large scale bridge projects

被引:9
作者
Yucelgazi, Fikri [1 ]
Yitmen, Ibrahim [2 ]
机构
[1] Bahcesehir Cyprus Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Mersin 10, Lefkosa Kibris, Turkey
[2] Jonkoping Univ, Dept Construct Engn & Lighting Sci, Jonkoping, Sweden
关键词
Large-scale; bridge projects; risk response; ANP; Europe; Middle East; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/10286608.2019.1702030
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Large-scale bridge projects (LSBPs) have emerged due to the gradually increasing transportation needs of the connections between isolated regions. In planning, construction or completion of today's LSBPs, responses are applied to risks arising in areas such as financial, design, environmental and managerial. The main objective of this study is to prioritise the risk responses from the contractors' point of view used in LSBPs in Europe and the Middle East by using the analytical network process (ANP). The priorities obtained separately for Europe and the Middle East were compared between each other. The results display that Europe and the Middle East include both common and different risk responses. Two case studies, one in each region, have been conducted to further support the priority values acquired in this study. The priorities and responses obtained in this study can be used as standard risk response list for the prevention or elimination of risks during the planning, construction or completion phases of projects to be implemented in the field of LSBPs in various countries. Lastly, the priorities obtained in this study could be a mirror to detect or juxtapose changes in future studies in the same field.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 27
页数:27
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Aggregation of factors causing cost overruns and time delays in large public construction projects Trends and implications [J].
Adam, Abderisak ;
Josephson, Per-Erik Bertil ;
Lindahl, Goran .
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 24 (03) :393-406
[2]  
Al Sabah R, 2018, MIDDLE EAST J MANAG, V5, P75
[3]  
Al-Ghazali, 2012, GCC EC, P217
[4]   A fuzzy logic approach to model delays in construction projects using translational models [J].
Al-Humaidi, H. M. ;
Tan, F. Hadipriono .
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2010, 27 (04) :353-364
[5]   Railway risk assessment - the fuzzy reasoning approach and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approaches: a case study of shunting at Waterloo depot [J].
An, M. ;
Huang, S. ;
Baker, C. J. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART F-JOURNAL OF RAIL AND RAPID TRANSIT, 2007, 221 (03) :365-383
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, THESIS
[7]   How to assess stakeholders' influence in project management? A proposal based on the Analytic Network Process [J].
Aragones-Beltran, Pablo ;
Garcia-Melon, Monica ;
Montesinos-Valera, Jesus .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 35 (03) :451-462
[8]  
Ashuri B., 2018, FHWAGA181640 DEP TRA
[9]  
Baker S., 1999, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V17, P205, DOI DOI 10.1080/014461999371709
[10]   An Analytical Network Process model for risks prioritisation in megaprojects [J].
Boateng, Prince ;
Chen, Zhen ;
Ogunlana, Stephen O. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (08) :1795-1811