Magnetic helicity injection and sigmoidal coronal loops

被引:25
作者
Yamamoto, TT
Kusano, K
Maeshiro, T
Yokoyama, T
Sakurai, T
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Sci, Dept Astron, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
[2] Japan Agcy Marine Earth Sci & Technol, Earth Simulator Ctr, Kanazawa Ku, Kanagawa 2360001, Japan
[3] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Adv Sci Matter, Hiroshima 7398530, Japan
[4] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Sci, Dept Earth & Planetary Phys, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
[5] Natl Astron Observ, Tokyo 1818588, Japan
关键词
Sun : corona; Sun : flares; Sun : photosphere; Sun; X-rays; gamma rays;
D O I
10.1086/429363
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We studied the relationship between magnetic helicity injection and the formation of sigmoidal loops. We analyzed seven active regions: three regions showed coronal loops similar to the potential field, and four regions showed the sigmoidal loops. The magnetic helicity injection rate was evaluated using the method proposed by Kusano et al. In order to compare the helicity of regions of various sizes, we defined the normalized helicity injection rate as the magnetic helicity injection rate divided by the magnetic flux squared. We found that the sigmoidal regions and nonsigmoidal regions have comparable normalized helicity injection rates. Next, we calculated the magnetic helicity content of the sigmoidal loops by using the magnetic flux tube model (Longcope & Welsch) and compared it with the magnetic helicity injected from around the footpoints of three sigmoidal loops. For two sigmoidal loops, it is found that these values are comparable. Another loop showed significant disagreement between helicity injection rate and its magnetic helicity content. Excluding this region on the basis of its complexity ( perhaps multiple loops forming a sigmoidal loop), we can conclude that geometric twist of the sigmoidal loops is consistent with the magnetic helicity injected from around the footpoints of the sigmoidal loops.
引用
收藏
页码:1072 / 1079
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] ACTON LW, 1992, SCIENCE, V258, P591
  • [2] Berger MA, 1999, GEOPH MONOG SERIES, V111, P1
  • [3] THE TOPOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF MAGNETIC HELICITY
    BERGER, MA
    FIELD, GB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1984, 147 (OCT) : 133 - 148
  • [4] Sigmoidal morphology and eruptive solar activity
    Canfield, RC
    Hudson, HS
    Mckenzie, DE
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1999, 26 (06) : 627 - 630
  • [5] Observational determination of the rate of magnetic helicity transport through the solar surface via the horizontal motion of field line footpoints
    Chae, J
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 560 (01) : L95 - L98
  • [6] Magnetic energy and helicity fluxes at the photospheric level
    Démoulin, P
    Berger, MA
    [J]. SOLAR PHYSICS, 2003, 215 (02) : 203 - 215
  • [7] What is the source of the magnetic helicity shed by CMEs?: The long-term helicity budget of AR 7978
    Démoulin, P
    Mandrini, CH
    van Driel-Gesztelyi, L
    Thompson, BJ
    Plunkett, S
    Kovári, Z
    Aulanier, G
    Young, A
    [J]. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2002, 382 (02) : 650 - 665
  • [8] The structure and evolution of a sigmoidal active region
    Gibson, SE
    Fletcher, L
    Del Zanna, G
    Pike, CD
    Mason, HE
    Mandrini, CH
    Démoulin, P
    Gilbert, H
    Burkepile, J
    Holzer, T
    Alexander, D
    Liu, Y
    Nitta, N
    Qiu, J
    Schmieder, B
    Thompson, BJ
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 574 (02) : 1021 - 1038
  • [9] The onset and association of CMEs with sigmoidal active regions
    Glover, A
    Ranns, NDR
    Harra, LK
    Culhane, JL
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2000, 27 (14) : 2161 - 2164
  • [10] The magnetic helicity budget of a CME-prolific active region
    Green, LM
    Fuentes, MCL
    Mandrini, CH
    Démoulin, P
    Van Driel-Gesztelyi, L
    Culhane, JL
    [J]. SOLAR PHYSICS, 2002, 208 (01) : 43 - 68