Patterns and implications of floral nectar secretion, chemical composition, removal effects and standing crop in Mandevilla pentlandiana (Apocynaceae)

被引:0
作者
Torres, C [1 ]
Galetto, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Multidisciplinario Biol Vegetal, RA-5000 Cordoba, Argentina
关键词
flower age; flower structure; hummingbirds; Hymenoptera; visitors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Flower morphology, nectar features (chemical composition, production pattern, removal effects, and standing crop) and floral visitors are analysed in an Argentine population of Mandevilla pentlandiana. Nectar variability was examined during the lifetime of a single flower, over the course of the flowering season, and at different times of che day. Nectar is sucrose dominant. There were some variations in the proportions of sugar throughout both the flower lifespan and the flowering season. Flowers produced most nectar during bud-stage. Nectar secretion ceased near the end of the first day after flower opening. Nectar quantity varied as a function af flower age due to a combination of nectar secretion, cessation, and resorption periods. Overall sugar production was increased by nectar removal. Standing crop data showed that each open flower and inflorescence offers c. 2 and 11 mg of sugar respectively at any time of the flowering season. There was higher nectar availability at the beginning of the flowering season compared with the rest of the period. Flowers were visited by bumblebees, honeybees and hummingbirds. The greater the number of open flowers and the nectar variance, the more the mean reward quantity per flower available in the inflorescence. The sources of nectar variability in M. pentlandiana seem to be linked with both the female function (nectar resorption, nectar cessation) and the male one (early and comparatively large nectar availability, variation in nectar production as the flower ages; nectar secretion stimulation by nectar removals). (C) 1998 The Linnean Society of London.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 223
页数:17
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Baker H. G., 1975, Coevolution of animals and plants. Symposium 5 of the 1st International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, Boulder, Colorado, USA. (Editors L. E. Gilbert and P. H. Raven)., P100
  • [2] Baker H.G., 1983, P117
  • [3] REPRODUCTIVE-BIOLOGY, VARIABILITY OF NECTAR FEATURES AND POLLINATION OF COMBRETUM-FRUTICOSUM (COMBRETACEAE) IN ARGENTINA
    BERNARDELLO, L
    GALETTO, L
    RODRIGUEZ, IG
    [J]. BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1994, 114 (03): : 293 - 308
  • [4] FLORAL NECTAR, NECTARY STRUCTURE AND POLLINATORS IN SOME ARGENTINEAN BROMELIACEAE
    BERNARDELLO, LM
    GALETTO, L
    JULIANI, HR
    [J]. ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1991, 67 (05) : 401 - 411
  • [5] DO FLOWERS REABSORB NECTAR
    BURQUEZ, A
    CORBET, SA
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1991, 5 (03) : 369 - 379
  • [6] Conn H. J., 1960, STAINING PROCEDURES, pI
  • [7] Corbet S.A., 1978, Linnean Society Symposium Series, P21
  • [8] Cruden R.W., 1983, P80
  • [9] EZCURRA C, 1981, Darwiniana (San Isidro), V23, P367
  • [10] Fallen M.E., 1986, BOT JB SYST, V106, P245