Clinitest rapid COVID-19 antigen test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multicenter evaluation study

被引:11
作者
Merino-Amador, Paloma [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gonzalez-Donapetry, Patricia [4 ]
Dominguez-Fernandez, Mercedes [5 ]
Gonzalez-Romo, Fernando [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Angel Sanchez-Castellano, Miguel [4 ]
Seoane-Estevez, Alejandro [5 ]
Delgado-Iribarren, Alberto [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Garcia, Julio [4 ]
Bou, German [5 ,6 ]
Cuenca-Estrella, Manuel [7 ]
Oteo-Iglesias, Jesus [6 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Clin San Carlos, Microbiol Dept, Madrid, Spain
[2] Inst Invest Sanitaria Hosp Clin San Carlos IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Complutense, Dept Med, Sch Med, Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ La Paz, Microbiol Dept, Madrid, Spain
[5] Complejo Hosp Univ A Coruna, Microbiol Dept, La Coruna, Spain
[6] Spanish Network Res Infect Dis REIPI, Madrid, Spain
[7] Inst Salud Carlos III ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
[8] Inst Salud Carlos III ISCIII, Natl Ctr Microbiol CNM, Madrid, Spain
关键词
COVID-19; Rapid antigen-detection test; SARS-CoV-2;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104961
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Objectives: RT-PCR assay is the reference method for diagnosis of COVID-19, but it is also a laborious and timeconsuming technic, limiting the availability of testing. Rapid antigen-detection tests are faster and less expensive; however, the reliability of these tests must be validated before they can be used widely. The objective of this study was to determine the performance of the Clinitest Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test (ClinitestRT) (SIEMENS) for SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Methods: This prospective multicenter study was carried out in three Spanish university hospitals including individuals with clinical symptoms or epidemiological criteria for COVID-19. Only individuals with <7 days from the onset of symptoms or from exposure to a confirmed case of COVID-19 were included. Two nasopharyngeal samples were taken to perform the ClinitestRT, as a point-of-care test, and a diagnostic RT-PCR test. Results: Overall sensitivity and specificity for the ClinitestRT among the 450 patients studied were 93.3% (CI 95%: 89.7-96.8) and 99.2% (CI 95%: 97.2-99.8), respectively. Sensitivity in participants with <5 days of the clinical course was 93.6% (CI 95%: 89.2-96.3), and in participants who had a CT < 25 for the RT-PCR test was 98.4% (CI 95%: 94.5-99.6). Agreement between techniques was 96.7% (kappa score: 0.93; CI 95%: 0.90-0.97). Conclusions: The ClinitestRT provides good clinical performance, with more reliable results for patients with a higher viral load. The results must be interpreted based on the local epidemiological context.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[11]   Considerations for diagnostic COVID-19 tests [J].
Vandenberg, Olivier ;
Martiny, Delphine ;
Rochas, Olivier ;
van Belkum, Alex ;
Kozlakidis, Zisis .
NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 19 (03) :171-183
[12]   In Vitro Diagnostic Assays for COVID-19: Recent Advances and Emerging Trends [J].
Vashist, Sandeep Kumar .
DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (04)
[13]  
WHO, 2020, LAB TEST STRAT REC C
[14]  
WHO World Health Organization, ADV US POINT OF CAR
[15]  
World Health Organization (WHO), 2020, ANT DET DIAGN SARS C
[16]   Clinical Evaluation of BD Veritor SARS-CoV-2 Point-of-Care Test Performance Compared to PCR-Based Testing and versus the Sofia 2 SARS Antigen Point-of-Care Test [J].
Young, Stephen ;
Taylor, Stephanie N. ;
Cammarata, Catherine L. ;
Varnado, Katey G. ;
Roger-Dalbert, Celine ;
Montano, Amanda ;
Griego-Fullbright, Christen ;
Burgard, Cameron ;
Fernandez, Catherine ;
Eckert, Karen ;
Andrews, Jeffrey C. ;
Ren, Huimiao ;
Allen, Joseph ;
Ackerman, Ronald ;
Cooper, Charles K. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 59 (01)