5-Year Survivorship and Outcomes of Robotic-Arm-Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

被引:6
作者
Gaudiani, Michael A. [1 ]
Samuel, Linsen T. [2 ]
Diana, John N. [3 ]
DeBattista, Jennifer L. [3 ]
Coon, Thomas M. [3 ]
Moore, Ryan E. [3 ]
Kamath, Atul F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 2799 Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 9500 Euclid Ave,Mail Code A40, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Coon Joint Replacement Inst, 6 Woodland Rd Suite 202, St Helena, CA 94574 USA
关键词
PATIENT SATISFACTION; REVISION; SURGEON; JOINT; RISK;
D O I
10.1155/2022/8995358
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Purpose. While unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has demonstrated benefits over total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in selected populations, component placement continues to be challenging with conventional surgical instruments, resulting in higher early failure rates. Robotic-arm-assisted UKA (RA-UKA) has shown to be successful in component positioning through preop planning and intraop adjustability. The purpose of this study is to assess the 5-year clinical outcomes of medial RAUKA. Methods. This study was a retrospective review of a single-center prospectively maintained cohort of 133 patients (146 knees) indicated for medial UKA from 2009 to 2013. Perioperative data and 2-and 5-year Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Score (WOMAC), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) outcome measures were collected. Five-year follow-up was recorded in 119 patients (131 knees). Results. Mean follow-up was 5.1 +/- 0.2 years. Mean age and BMI were 68.0 +/- 8.1 years and 29.3 +/- 4.7 kg/m(2), respectively. At 2-year follow-up, mean KOOS, WOMAC, and FJS were 71.5 +/- 15.3, 14.3 +/- 7.9, and 79.1 +/- 25.8, respectively. At 5-year follow-up, mean KOOS, WOMAC, and FJS were 71.6 +/- 15.2, 14.2 +/- 7.9, and 80.9 +/- 25.1, respectively. Mean change in KOOS and WOMAC was 34.6 +/- 21.4 and 11.0 +/- 13.6, respectively (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). For patient satisfaction at last follow-up, 89% of patients were very satisfied/ satisfied and 5% were dissatisfied. For patient activity expectations at last follow-up, 85% met activity expectations, 52% were more active than before, 25% have the same level of activity, 23% were less active than before, and 89% were walking without support. All patients returned to driving after surgery at a mean 15.2 +/- 9.4 days. Survivorship was 95% (95% CI 0.91-0.98) at 5 years. One knee (1%) had a patellofemoral revision, two knees (1.3%) were revised to different partial knee replacements, and five knees (3.4%) were converted to TKA. Conclusion. Overall, medial RA-UKA demonstrated improved patient-recorded outcomes, high patient satisfaction, met expectations, and excellent functional recovery. Midterm survivorship was excellent. Longitudinal follow-up is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes of robotic-arm-assisted UKA procedures.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Un annual report 2019
[2]   Is unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) superior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA)? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial [J].
Arirachakaran A. ;
Choowit P. ;
Putananon C. ;
Muangsiri S. ;
Kongtharvonskul J. .
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2015, 25 (5) :799-806
[3]   Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals [J].
Badawy, Mona ;
Espehaug, Birgitte ;
Indrekvam, Kari ;
Havelin, Leif I. ;
Furnes, Ove .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2014, 85 (04) :342-347
[4]   Center and Surgeon Volume Influence the Revision Rate Following Unicondylar Knee Replacement [J].
Baker, Paul ;
Jameson, Simon ;
Critchley, Rebecca ;
Reed, Mike ;
Gregg, Paul ;
Deehan, David .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (08) :702-709
[5]   Improved Accuracy of Component Positioning with Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Bell, Stuart W. ;
Anthony, Iain ;
Jones, Bryn ;
MacLean, Angus ;
Rowe, Philip ;
Blyth, Mark .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (08) :627-635
[6]   Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty EXPLORATORY SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
Blyth, M. J. G. ;
Anthony, I. ;
Rowe, P. ;
Banger, M. S. ;
MacLean, A. ;
Jones, B. .
BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2017, 6 (11) :631-639
[7]   Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty Who is Satisfied and Who is Not? [J].
Bourne, Robert B. ;
Chesworth, Bert M. ;
Davis, Aileen M. ;
Mahomed, Nizar N. ;
Charron, Kory D. J. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (01) :57-63
[8]   Mid-term survivorship and patient-reported outcomes of robotic-arm assisted partial knee arthroplasty A SINGLE-SURGEON STUDY OF 1,018 KNEES [J].
Burger, J. A. ;
Kleeblad, L. J. ;
Laas, N. ;
Pearle, A. D. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2020, 102B (01) :108-116
[9]   Faster return to sport after robotic-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparative study [J].
Canetti, R. ;
Batailler, C. ;
Bankhead, C. ;
Neyret, P. ;
Servien, E. ;
Lustig, S. .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2018, 138 (12) :1765-1771
[10]   Transfusions and blood loss in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective observational study [J].
Carling, Malin S. ;
Jeppsson, Anders ;
Eriksson, Bengt I. ;
Brisby, Helena .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2015, 10