Developing a framework of, and quality indicators for, general practice management in Europe

被引:89
作者
Engels, Y [1 ]
Campbell, S
Dautzenberg, M
van den Hombergh, P
Brinkmann, H
Szécsényi, J
Falcoff, H
Seuntjens, L
Kuenzi, B
Grol, R
机构
[1] Ctr Qual Care Res WOK, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Manchester, Natl Primary Care Res & Dev Ctr, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
Delphi Technique; Europe; practice management; primary care; quality indicators;
D O I
10.1093/fampra/cmi002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. To develop a framework for general practice management made up of quality indicators shared by six European countries. Methods. Two-round postal Delphi questionnaire in the setting of general practice in Belgium, France, Germany, The Netherlands, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Six national expert panels, each consisting of 10 members, primarily primary care practitioners and experts in the field of quality in primary care participated in the study. The main outcome measures were: (a) a European framework with indicators for the organization of primary care; and (b) ratings of the face validity of the usefulness of the indicators by expert panels in six countries. Results. Agreement was reached about a definition of practice management across five domains (infrastructure, staff, information, finance, and quality and safety), and a common set of indicators for the organization of general practice. The panellist response rate was 95%. Sixty-two indicators (37%) were rated face valid by all six panels. Examples include out of hours service, accessiblility, the content of doctors' bags and staff involvement in quality improvement. No indicators were rated invalid by all six panels. Conclusions. It proved to be possible to develop a European set of indicators for assessing the quality of practice management, despite the differences in health care systems and cultures in the six different countries. These indicators will now be used in a quality assessment procedure of practice management in nine European countries. While organizational indicators are part of the new GMS contract in the UK, this research shows that many practice management issues within primary care are also of relevance in other European countries.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 222
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] BENTZEN N, 1995, FAM PRACT, V12, P341, DOI 10.1093/fampra/12.3.341
  • [2] CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT AS AN IDEAL IN HEALTH-CARE
    BERWICK, DM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 320 (01) : 53 - 56
  • [3] Bocken J., 2001, REFORMING HLTH SECTO
  • [4] Boerma WGW., 2003, PROFILES GEN PRACTIC
  • [5] Brook R H, 1986, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, V2, P53
  • [6] Quality indicators for general practice: which ones can general practitioners and health authority managers agree are important and how useful are they?
    Campbell, SM
    Roland, MO
    Quayle, JA
    Buetow, SA
    Shekelle, PG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1998, 20 (04): : 414 - 421
  • [7] Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care
    Campbell, SM
    Braspenning, J
    Hutchinson, A
    Marshall, M
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 11 (04): : 358 - 364
  • [8] Defining quality of care
    Campbell, SM
    Roland, MO
    Buetow, SA
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 51 (11) : 1611 - 1625
  • [9] THE QUALITY OF CARE - HOW CAN IT BE ASSESSED
    DONABEDIAN, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 260 (12): : 1743 - 1748
  • [10] Donabedian A., 1980, EXPLORATIONS QUALITY, VI