Outpatient gamma knife surgery for vestibular schwannoma:: definition of the therapeutic profile based on a 10-year experience

被引:70
作者
Wowra, B
Muacevic, A
Jess-Hempen, A
Hempel, JM
Müller-Schunk, S
Tonn, JC
机构
[1] Gamma Knife Zentrum, D-80939 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, Klinikum Grosshadern, Dept Neurosurg, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Munich, Klinikum Grosshadern, Dept Ear Nose & Throat Surg, D-8000 Munich, Germany
关键词
gamma knife surgery; vestibular schwannoma; tumor volumetry;
D O I
10.3171/jns.2005.102.s_supplement.0114
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. The purpose of the study was to define the therapeutic profile of outpatient gamma knife surgery (GKS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) by using sequential tumor volumetry to quantify changes following treatment. Methods. A total of 111 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up duration was 7 years (range 5-9.6 years). Thirty-seven patients (33%) had undergone surgery before GKS and 10 (9%) had neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2). The median VS volume was 1.6 cm(3) (range 0.08-8.7 cm(3)). The actuarial 6-year tumor control rate after a single GKS treatment was 95%. Tumor swelling was observed in 43 patients (38.7%). Recurrence was significantly associated with NF2 (p < 0.003) and the reduced dose (p < 0.03) delivered to these tumors. The incidence of facial nerve neuropathy was mainly determined by surgery prior to GKS (p < 0.0001). Facial nerve radiation toxicity was mild and transient. No permanent facial nerve toxicity was observed. Trigeminal neuropathy occurred in 13 patients, and this was correlated with the VS volume (p < 0.02). The median hearing loss was -10 dB (range +20 dB to -70 dB). The risk of hearing loss was correlated with age and transient tumor swelling (p < 0.05) but not with dose parameters or NF2. Conclusions. Outpatient GKS is feasible, effective, and safe. Its therapeutic profile compares favorably with that of microsurgery.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 118
页数:5
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   GROWTH OF ACOUSTIC NEURINOMAS [J].
AMADASUN, JEO .
ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 1977, 217 (01) :99-102
[2]   Stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of acoustic schwannomas: Comparative observations of 125 patients treated at one institution [J].
Andrews, DW ;
Suarez, O ;
Goldman, HW ;
Downes, MB ;
Bednarz, G ;
Corn, BW ;
Werner-Wasik, M ;
Rosenstock, J ;
Curran, WJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (05) :1265-1278
[3]   Acute hearing loss following fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for acoustic neuroma - Report of two cases [J].
Chang, SD ;
Poen, J ;
Hancock, SL ;
Martin, DP ;
Adler, JR .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1998, 89 (02) :321-325
[4]   Vestibular schwannoma growth: The continuing controversy [J].
Charabi, S ;
Tos, M ;
Thomsen, J ;
Charabi, B ;
Mantoni, M .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2000, 110 (10) :1720-1725
[5]  
Charabi S, 2000, Ugeskr Laeger, V162, P5497
[6]  
Charabi S, 2000, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, P7
[7]   Does choice of hearing selection criterion and reporting criteria affect the hearing preservation rate in vestibular schwannoma surgery? [J].
da Cruz, MJ ;
Moffat, DA ;
Baguley, DM ;
Beynon, GJ ;
Hardy, DG .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1999, 121 (03) :313-317
[8]   Conservative management of acoustic neuroma: An outcome study [J].
Deen, HG ;
Ebersold, MJ ;
Harner, SG ;
Beatty, CW ;
Marion, MS ;
Wharen, RE ;
Green, JD ;
Quast, L .
NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 39 (02) :260-264
[9]  
Delbrouck C, 2003, Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg, V57, P197
[10]  
Flickinger JC, 1999, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V44, P481