Mechanical properties of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold compared to the metallic everolimus-eluting stent

被引:13
|
作者
Dalos, Daniel [1 ]
Gangl, Clemens [1 ]
Roth, Christian [1 ]
Krenn, Lisa [1 ]
Scherzer, Sabine [1 ]
Vertesich, Markus [1 ]
Lang, Irene [1 ]
Maurer, Gerald [1 ]
Neunteufl, Thomas [2 ]
Berger, Rudolf [3 ]
Delle-Karth, Georg [4 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Div Cardiol, Dept Internal Med 2, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Hosp Krems, Div Cardiol, Dept Internal Med, Krems, Austria
[3] Barmherzige Bruder Eisenstadt, Div Cardiol, Dept Internal Med, Eisenstadt, Austria
[4] Krankenhaus Hietzing, Div Cardiol, Dept Internal Med, Vienna, Austria
来源
BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS | 2016年 / 16卷
关键词
Bioresorbable Scaffold; Drug-Eluting Stent; Optical Coherence Tomography; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; ROUTINE CLINICAL-PRACTICE; THROMBOSIS; ABSORB; 2ND-GENERATION; OUTCOMES; MULTICENTER; STENOSIS; IMPLANTATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12872-016-0296-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) represent an innovative treatment option for coronary artery disease. Clinical and angiographic results seem promising, however, data on its immediate procedural performance are still scarce. The aim of our study was to assess the mechanical properties of BVS by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in clinical routine. Methods: Post-implantation OCT images of 40 BVS were retrospectively compared to those of 40 metallic everolimus-eluting stents (EES). Post-procedural device related morphological features were assessed. This included incidences of gross underexpansion and the stent eccentricity index (SEI, minimum/maximum diameter) as a measure for focal radial strength. Results: Patients receiving BVS were younger than those with EES (54.0 +/- 11.2 years versus 61.7 +/- 11.4 years, p = 0.012), the remaining baseline, vessel and lesion characteristics were comparable between groups. Lesion pre-dilatation was more frequently performed and inflation time was longer in the BVS than in the EES group (n = 34 versus n = 23, p = 0. 006 and 44.2 +/- 12.8 versus 25.6 +/- 8.4 seconds, p < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in maximal inflation pressures and post-dilatation frequencies with non-compliant balloons between groups. Whereas gross device underexpansion was not significantly different, SEI was significantly lower in the BVS group (n = 12 (30 %) versus n = 14 (35 %), p = 0.812 and 0.69 +/- 0.08 versus 0.76 +/- 0.09, p < 0.001, respectively). There was no difference in major adverse cardiac event-rate at six months. Conclusion: Our data show that focal radial expansion was significantly reduced in BVS compared to EES in a clinical routine setting using no routine post-dilatation protocol. Whether these findings have impact on scaffold mid-term results as well as on clinical outcome has to be investigated in larger, randomized trials.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Incidence and Potential Mechanism(s) of Post-Procedural Rise of Cardiac Biomarker in Patients With Coronary Artery Narrowing After Implantation of an Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold or Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent
    Ishibashi, Yuki
    Muramatsu, Takashi
    Nakatani, Shimpei
    Sotomi, Yohei
    Suwannasom, Pannipa
    Grundeken, Maik J.
    Cho, Yun-kyeong
    Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
    van Boven, Ad J.
    Piek, Jan J.
    Sabate, Manel
    Helqvist, Steffen
    Baumbach, Andreas
    McClean, Dougal
    Almeida, Manuel de Sousa
    Wasungu, Luc
    Miquel-Hebert, Karine
    Dudek, Dariusz
    Chevalier, Bernard
    Onuma, Yoshinobu
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (08) : 1053 - 1063
  • [22] REPLY: Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Vascular Scaffold for Long Coronary Lesions
    Geraci, Salvatore
    Kawamoto, Hiroyoshi
    Capodanno, Davide
    Caramanno, Giuseppe
    Latib, Azeem
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (12) : 1275 - 1276
  • [23] Intraindividual Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Drug-Eluting Metallic Stents
    Cassese, Salvatore
    Hoppmann, Petra
    Kufner, Sebastian
    Byrne, Robert A.
    Wiebe, Jens
    Colleran, Roisin
    Giacoppo, Daniele
    Harada, Yukinori
    Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig
    Schunkert, Heribert
    Fusaro, Massimiliano
    Kastrati, Adnan
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (08)
  • [24] Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Real World Practice - A Single Center Experience
    Liang, Huai-Wen
    Kao, Hsien-Li
    Lin, Yen-Hung
    Hwang, Juey-Jen
    Lin, Mao-Shin
    Chiang, Fu-Tien
    Lee, Chii-Ming
    Yeh, Chih-Fan
    Wang, Tzung-Dau
    Wu, Cho-Kai
    Lin, Lian-Yu
    Tsai, Chia-Ti
    Chen, Ying-Hsien
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 33 (03) : 250 - 257
  • [25] Comparative Clinical Resource Utilization With Bioresorbable Everolimus-eluting Scaffolds Vs. Metallic Everolimus-eluting Stent With Abluminal Polymer In Contemporary Clinical Practice
    De la Torre Hernandez, Jose M.
    Garcia Camarero, Tamara
    Lee, Dae-Hyun
    Sainz Laso, Fermin
    Rubio, Silvia
    Toranzo, Ines
    Ruiz Guerrero, Luis
    Pino, Tania
    Veiga Fernandez, Gabriela
    Zueco, Javier
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 66 (15) : B206 - B207
  • [26] Early results following everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation for the treatment of in-stent restenosis
    Ielasi, Alfonso
    Latib, Azeem
    Naganuma, Toru
    Cortese, Bernardo
    Sato, Katsumasa
    Miyazaki, Tadashi
    Panoulas, Vasileios F.
    Tespili, Maurizio
    Colombo, Antonio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 173 (03) : 513 - 514
  • [27] Comparison of everolimus-eluting and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: study protocol of the randomized controlled EVERBIO II trial
    Diego Arroyo
    Mario Togni
    Serban Puricel
    Baeriswyl Gerard
    Lehmann Sonja
    Noé Corpataux
    Hélène Villeneuve
    Estelle Boute
    Jean-Christophe Stauffer
    Jean-Jacques Goy
    Stéphane Cook
    Trials, 15
  • [28] Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in Kawasaki disease: serial OCT observation
    Vogiatzi, Georgia
    Toutouzas, Konstantinos
    Karanasos, Antonis
    Synetos, Andreas
    Latsios, Georgios
    Tsiamis, Eleftherios
    Tousoulis, Dimitris
    HELLENIC JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 59 (06) : 358 - 359
  • [29] A randomized trial evaluating everolimus-eluting Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB Japan
    Kimura, Takeshi
    Kozuma, Ken
    Tanabe, Kengo
    Nakamura, Sunao
    Yamane, Masahisa
    Muramatsu, Toshiya
    Saito, Shigeru
    Yajima, Junji
    Hagiwara, Nobuhisa
    Mitsudo, Kazuaki
    Popma, Jeffrey J.
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Onuma, Yoshinobu
    Ying, Shihwa
    Cao, Sherry
    Staehr, Peter
    Cheong, Wai-Fung
    Kusano, Hajime
    Stone, Gregg W.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (47) : 3332 - 3342
  • [30] Comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis (ABSORB II): a 3 year, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Chevalier, Bernard
    Sotomi, Yohei
    Cequier, Angel
    Carrie, Didier
    Piek, Jan J.
    Van Boven, Ad J.
    Dominici, Marcello
    Dudek, Dariusz
    McClean, Dougal
    Helqvist, Steffen
    Haude, Michael
    Reith, Sebastian
    Almeida, Manuel de Sousa
    Campo, Gianluca
    Iniguez, Andres
    Sabate, Manel
    Windecker, Stephan
    Onuma, Yoshinobu
    LANCET, 2016, 388 (10059) : 2479 - 2491