Benefits of marriage on relative and conditional relative cancer survival differ between males and females in the USA

被引:36
作者
Merrill, Ray M. [1 ]
Johnson, Erin [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Coll Life Sci, 2063 Life Sci Bldg, Provo, UT 84604 USA
关键词
Cancer; Conditional survival; Relative survival; Population-based; Prognosis; SEER; MARITAL-STATUS; BREAST-CANCER; SOCIAL NETWORKS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; UNITED-STATES; SUPPORT; GENDER; DIAGNOSIS; INTERVENTION; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s11764-017-0627-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of the paper is to assess the influence of marital status on conditional relative survival of cancer according to sex. Methods Analyses involved 779,978 males and 1,032,868 females diagnosed with 1 of 13 cancer types between 2000 and 2008, and followed through 2013. Data are from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Regression models were adjusted for age, sex, race, and tumor stage. Results Five-year relative survival conditional on years already survived is higher among married patients with less lethal cancers (oral cavity and pharynx, colon and rectum, breast, urinary bladder, kidney and renal pelvis, melanoma of the skin, thyroid, lymphoma). For more lethal cancers, married patients have similar (liver, lung and bronchus, pancreas, leukemia) or poorer (brain and other nervous system) cancer survival. Separated/divorced or widowed patients have the lowest conditional relative survival rates. For most cancers, 5-year cancer relative survival rates conditional on time already survived through 5 years approach 70 to 90% of that for the general population. The beneficial effect of marriage on survival decreases with years already survived. Superior conditional relative survival rates in females decrease with time already survived and are less pronounced in married patients. Conclusion Five-year relative survival rates improve with time already survived. The benefits of marriage on conditional relative survival are greater for less lethal cancers. Greater 5-year conditional relative survival rates in females narrow with time already survived and are less pronounced in married patients. Implications for Cancer Survivors Conditional relative survival rates of cancer can lead to more informed decisions and understanding regarding treatment and prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 589
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [31] National Cancer Institute, DAT FLOW NCIS SEER R
  • [32] National Cancer Institute, REL SURV RAT
  • [33] National Cancer Institute, PROC CANC DAT COLL
  • [34] Social support and cancer progression: A systematic review
    Nausheen, Bina
    Gidron, Yori
    Peveler, Robert
    Moss-Morris, Rona
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2009, 67 (05) : 403 - 415
  • [35] The Protective Effect of Marriage for Survival: A Review and Update
    Rendall, Michael S.
    Weden, Margaret M.
    Favreault, Melissa M.
    Waldron, Hilary
    [J]. DEMOGRAPHY, 2011, 48 (02) : 481 - 506
  • [36] Use of coping strategies and breast cancer survival: Results from the black/white cancer survival study
    Reynolds, P
    Hurley, S
    Torres, M
    Jackson, J
    Boyd, P
    Chen, VW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 152 (10) : 940 - 949
  • [37] Rowland JH, 2010, DIS BREAST
  • [38] Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2012, featuring the increasing incidence of liver cancer
    Ryerson, A. Blythe
    Eheman, Christie R.
    Altekruse, Sean F.
    Ward, John W.
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    Sherman, Recinda L.
    Henley, S. Jane
    Holtzman, Deborah
    Lake, Andrew
    Noone, Anne-Michelle
    Anderson, Robert N.
    Ma, Jiemin
    Ly, Kathleen N.
    Cronin, Kathleen A.
    Penberthy, Lynne
    Kohler, Betsy A.
    [J]. CANCER, 2016, 122 (09) : 1312 - 1337
  • [39] Sammon JD, BJU INT, V110, P1201
  • [40] The impact of marital status at diagnosis on cancer survival in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer
    Shi, Rong-liang
    Qu, Ning
    Lu, Zhong-wu
    Liao, Tian
    Gao, Yi
    Ji, Qing-hai
    [J]. CANCER MEDICINE, 2016, 5 (08): : 2145 - 2154