Floodplain Buyouts and Municipal Finance

被引:32
作者
BenDor, Todd K. [1 ]
Salvesen, David [2 ]
Kamrath, Christian [3 ]
Ganser, Brooke [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept City & Reg Planning, CB 3140,New East Bldg, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Inst Environm, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Miami Dade Cty Off Resilience, 111 NW 1st St,12th Floor, Miami, FL 33128 USA
[4] Durham City Cty Planning Dept, 101 City Hall Plaza, Durham, NC 27701 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY; DECISION-MAKING; OPEN SPACE; HURRICANE; RELOCATE; POLICY;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000380
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Floodplain buyouts-the acquisition and removal of flood-damaged homes-have become increasingly important in federal disaster policy. However, there has been little research on how buyouts fiscally impact local governments. Buyouts can reduce future disaster-relief costs, create valuable open space, and reduce maintenance costs where urban infrastructure can be permanently removed. Conversely, buyouts can reduce property tax revenues and saddle municipalities with new buyout property maintenance costs. What are the range of potential fiscal impacts of buyouts on municipalities? This paper seeks to address this question while establishing a user-friendly process for estimating accurate impact ranges. The authors assessed the fiscal impacts of buyouts in eight North Carolina case-study communities, developing and testing a scenario-driven spreadsheet model to explore how community characteristics, policies, and strategies for buyout program design can affect the fiscal impacts of a buyout over time. It was discovered that fiscal impacts depend on at least three key factors, including (1) the spatial distribution of the acquired properties, (2) whether buyout participants relocate within their community, and (3) the management and maintenance regimes of acquired properties.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Open space, residential property values, and spatial context
    Anderson, Soren T.
    West, Sarah E.
    [J]. REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2006, 36 (06) : 773 - 789
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, NAT HAZARDS REV, DOI [DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:4(97), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:4(97)]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, CENS 2010 SUMM FIL 1
  • [4] Binder S.B., 2014, RESILIENCE POSTDISAS
  • [5] The Devil Is in the Details: Linking Home Buyout Policy, Practice, and Experience After Hurricane Sandy
    Binder, Sherri Brokopp
    Greer, Alex
    [J]. POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2016, 4 (04): : 97 - 106
  • [6] Rebuild or Relocate? Resilience and Postdisaster Decision-Making After Hurricane Sandy
    Binder, Sherri Brokopp
    Baker, Charlene K.
    Barile, John P.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 56 (1-2) : 180 - 196
  • [7] BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics), 2018, CONS PRIC IND CPI HO
  • [8] The value of urban open space: Meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results
    Brander, Luke M.
    Koetse, Mark J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 92 (10) : 2763 - 2773
  • [9] Attitudes towards relocation following Hurricane Sandy: should we stay or should we go?
    Bukvic, Anamaria
    Owen, Graham
    [J]. DISASTERS, 2017, 41 (01) : 101 - 123
  • [10] Burchell R., 1978, FISCAL IMPACT HDB