Cognitive conflict in human-automation interactions: A psychophysiological study

被引:54
|
作者
Dehais, Frederic [1 ]
Causse, Mickael [1 ]
Vachon, Francois [2 ]
Tremblay, Sebastien [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse, ISAE, DMIA, F-31055 Toulouse 4, France
[2] Univ Laval, Ecole Psychol, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
关键词
Human-automation conflicts; Robotic; Perseveration behavior; Attentional shrinking; Eye tracking; Physiological measurement; ERROR; PERFORMANCE; RESPONSES; EMOTION; MODE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2011.09.004
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The review of literature in sociology and distributed artificial intelligence reveals that the occurrence of conflict is a remarkable precursor to the disruption of multi-agent systems. The study of this concept could be applied to human factors concerns, as man-system conflict appears to provoke perseveration behavior and to degrade attentional abilities with a trend to excessive focus. Once entangled in such conflicts, the human operator will do anything to succeed in his current goal even if it jeopardizes the mission. in order to confirm these findings, an experimental setup, composed of a real unmanned ground vehicle, a ground station is developed. A scenario involving an authority conflict between the participants and the robot is proposed. Analysis of the effects of the conflict on the participants' cognition and arousal is assessed through heart-rate measurement (reflecting stress level) and eye-tracking techniques (index of attentional focus). Our results clearly show that the occurrence of the conflict leads to perseveration behavior and can induce higher heart rate as well as excessive attentional focus. These results are discussed in terms of task commitment issues and increased arousal. Moreover, our results suggest that individual differences may predict susceptibility to perseveration behavior. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 595
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Affective Processes in Human-Automation Interactions
    Merritt, Stephanie M.
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2011, 53 (04) : 356 - 370
  • [2] Cognitive Ergonomics for Situated Human-Automation Collaboration
    Brinkman, Willem-Paul
    Neerincx, Mark A.
    van Oostendorp, Herre
    INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 2011, 23 (04) : III - IV
  • [3] The Activated Failures of Human-Automation Interactions on the Flight Deck
    Li, Wen-Chin
    Greaves, Matthew
    Durando, Davide
    Lin, John J. H.
    JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS AND AVIATION, 2016, 48 (03): : 163 - 171
  • [4] Analysis of the initial representations of the human-automation interactions (HAI)
    Wagemann, L
    TRAVAIL HUMAIN, 1998, 61 (02): : 129 - 151
  • [5] Risk assessment of human-automation conflict under cyberattacks in process systems
    Wen, He
    Khan, Faisal
    Ahmed, Salim
    Imtiaz, Syed
    Pistikopoulos, Stratos
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 172
  • [6] Displaced Interactions in Human-Automation Relationships: Transparency over Time
    Miller, Christopher A.
    ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS (EPCE 2018), 2018, 10906 : 191 - 203
  • [7] A Multi-Perspective View on Human-Automation Interactions in Aviation
    Quercioli, Monica Samantha
    Amaldi, Paola
    HUMAN WORK INTERACTION DESIGN: WORK ANALYSIS AND INTERACTION DESIGN METHODS FOR PERVASIVE AND SMART WORKPLACES, 2015, 468 : 168 - 179
  • [8] Adaptable (Not Adaptive) Automation: The Forefront of Human-Automation Teaming
    Calhoun, Gloria
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2022, 64 (02) : 269 - 277
  • [9] Special issue on human-automation coagency
    Inagaki, T.
    COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2012, 14 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [10] Formal verification of human-automation interaction
    Degani, A
    Heymann, M
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2002, 44 (01) : 28 - 43