The borrowed view: Privacy, propriety, and the entanglements of property

被引:50
作者
Blomley, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Geog, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
来源
LAW AND SOCIAL INQUIRY-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION | 2005年 / 30卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1086/500177
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
A dominant characterization celebrates property as a means to attain privacy and autonomy. Drawing on recent scholarship, I compare this idea with a proprietarian perspective, which emphasizes the ways in which private ownership comes freighted with public responsibilities. The garden, I shall argue, reveals both dimensions to property. Drawing from gardening debates over the past century and an empirical survey of gardening in Vancouver, Canada, I conclude by arguing, first, that the ends of property are more diverse than we suppose, and second, that these two conceptions should in fact be thought of not as incompatible and opposed, but as entangled and interrelated. While judicial and academic evaluations tend to rely on a binary view of property, so that privacy and propriety seem to live in different spaces, my findings suggest a more fluid cohabitation.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 661
页数:45
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]   The garden as occasional domestic space [J].
Alexander, C .
SIGNS, 2002, 27 (03) :857-871
[2]  
Alexander Gregory S., 1998, NEBRASKA LAW REV, V77, P667
[3]  
Alexander GregoryS., 1997, Commodity and Propriety: Competing Visions of Property in American Legal Thought, 1776-1970
[4]  
Alexander GS, 2003, CORNELL LAW REV, V88, P733
[5]  
[Anonymous], YALE J LAW FEMINISM
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, UNSETTLING CITY URBA
[7]  
[Anonymous], WHO OWNS AM SOCIAL C
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Playing Darts with a Rembrandt: Public and Private Rights in Cultural Treasures
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1979, COMMENTARIES LAWS EN
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ARIZONA STATE LAW J