The influence of soft contact lenses on the intraocular pressure measurement

被引:16
作者
Firat, P. G. [1 ]
Cankaya, C. [2 ]
Doganay, S. [1 ]
Cavdar, M. [1 ]
Duman, S. [1 ]
Ozsoy, E. [3 ]
Koc, B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Inonu Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Turgut Ozal Med Ctr, Malatya, Turkey
[2] State Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Malatya, Turkey
[3] State Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Siirt, Turkey
[4] State Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Kahramanmaras, Turkey
关键词
dynamic contour tonometry; non-contact tonometry; goldmann applanation tonometry; contact lens; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; TONO-PEN; NONCONTACT TONOMETER; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1038/eye.2011.271
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the influence of silicone hydrogel contact lenses on the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), non-contact tonometry (NCT), and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). Methods We included in the study 40 eyes of 40 patients who did not have any ocular or systemic diseases or contraindications to contact lens use. We measured and recorded the IOP values of each patient using NCT without and with contact lenses (groups 1 and 2, respectively), using DCT without and with contact lenses (groups 3 and 4, respectively), and using GAT without contact lenses (group 5). Results The mean IOP value of group 1 was 14.55 +/- 2.95 mmHg and 13.92 +/- 2.58 mmHg in group 2. We detected no statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (P = 0.053). The mean IOP values for group 3 and group 4 were 16.26 +/- 2.33 mmHg and 15.19 +/- 2.40 mmHg, respectively. We detected a statistically significant difference between groups 3 and 4 (P = 0.005). Group 5's mean IOP value was 12.97 +/- 2.65 mmHg. IOP values measured with DCT were statistically significantly higher compared with IOP values measured with NCT and GAT (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Additionally, IOP values measured with NCT were statistically significantly higher compared with IOP values measured with GAT (P < 0.0001). Conclusion According to the results of our study, silicone hydrogel soft contact lens use does not significantly affect IOP values measured with NCT, but it affects IOP values measured with DCT. Eye (2012) 26, 278-282; doi:10.1038/eye.2011.271; published online 11 November 2011
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 282
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Almurad TM, 2008, CLIN EXP OPTOM, V916, P524
[2]   Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects [J].
Barleon, Lorenz ;
Hoffmann, Esther M. ;
Berres, Manfred ;
Pfeiffer, Norbert ;
Grus, Franz H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 142 (04) :583-590
[3]   The use of contact lenses in the treatment of persistent epithelial defects [J].
Blackmore, Sally Jayne .
CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2010, 33 (05) :239-244
[4]   Comparison of three methods of intraocular pressure measurement and their relation to central corneal thickness [J].
Carbonaro, F. ;
Andrew, T. ;
Mackey, D. A. ;
Spector, T. D. ;
Hammond, C. J. .
EYE, 2010, 24 (07) :1165-1170
[5]   Long-term effects of the extended wear of senofilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lenses on ocular tissues [J].
Guillon, Michel ;
Maissa, Cecile .
OPTOMETRY-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION, 2010, 81 (12) :671-679
[6]   The effect of corneal edema on dynamic contour and Goldmann tonometry [J].
Hamilton, Kirsten E. ;
Pye, David C. ;
Kao, Lawrence ;
Pham, Nhung ;
Tran, An-Quyen Nguyen .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2008, 85 (06) :451-456
[7]   Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry [J].
Hsu, S-Y ;
Sheu, M-M ;
Hsu, A-H ;
Wu, K-Y ;
Yeh, J-I ;
Tien, J-N ;
Tsai, R-K .
EYE, 2009, 23 (07) :1582-1588
[8]   EFFECT OF CONTACT-LENS REMOVAL OR DISPLACEMENT ON INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE [J].
KHAN, JA ;
GRAHAM, CE .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1991, 109 (06) :825-828
[9]   Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states [J].
Kniestedt, C ;
Nee, M ;
Stamper, RL .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 243 (04) :359-366
[10]   Intraocular Pressure Measurement Precision with the Goldmann Applanation, Dynamic Contour, and Ocular Response Analyzer Tonometers [J].
Kotecha, Aachal ;
White, Edward ;
Schlottmann, Patricio G. ;
Garway-Heath, David F. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 117 (04) :730-737