The Design and Evaluation of Online Interactive Learning in an Undergraduate Nutrition Course

被引:3
作者
Livingstone, Katherine M. [1 ]
Milte, Catherine M. [1 ]
Macfarlane, Susie [2 ]
Woods, Julie [1 ]
Booth, Alison [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Inst Phys Act & Nutr, Sch Exercise & Nutr Sci, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Deakin Learning Futures, Geelong, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
design; evaluation; online; interactive; learning; undergraduate; nutrition; STUDENTS; PREFERENCES; ENGAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3389/fnut.2022.811103
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Understanding factors that promote student engagement with online learning environments is important for benchmarking and improving the quality of teaching in a digital era. This study aimed to describe the online interactive content created for delivery of an undergraduate nutrition course and to evaluate student engagement with the online interactive content. We collected online questionnaire data in 2018 and 2019 from two cohorts of students enrolled in a Deakin University undergraduate nutrition unit. Two-sample unpaired t-tests were used to examine differences in participant engagement with online topic guides between static text-based and interactive content. A total of 89 participants (19-56 years) were included. Sixty four of students reported always/usually reading static text-based topic guides most weeks and 64% perceived them as moderately/highly effective. While 60% of participants reported reading the online interactive topic guides most weeks and 93% perceived them as moderate/highly effective. Most participants indicated the interactive topic guides were more effective than static text-based topic guides they experienced in other courses (76%). Hours dedicated to the online interactive topic guide were higher (6.4 SD 2.9 vs. 1.7 SD 1.7 h; P < 0.001) as was the rating of how engaging the topic guides were (7.2 SD 1.6 vs. 6.7 SD 2.5; P = 0.008). These findings suggest that interactive content is more engaging. However, this content may not be accessible to all students, and so familiarization and training prior to engaging in an interactive online unit may be needed.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HDB QUALITATIVE RES, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327027HC1901_5
[2]   The effects of online and blended experience on outcomes in a blended learning environment [J].
Asarta, Carlos J. ;
Schmidt, James R. .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 44
[3]   Redesigning an Undergraduate Nutrition Course through Active Learning and Team-Based Projects Enhances Student Performance [J].
Bailey, Regan L. ;
Kiesel, Violet A. ;
Lobene, Andrea J. ;
Zou, Peishan .
CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS IN NUTRITION, 2020, 4 (04)
[4]  
Black P., 1998, Assess Educ Princ Policy Pract, V5, P7, DOI DOI 10.1080/0969595980050102
[5]   Student preferences in using online learning resources [J].
Brown, BW ;
Liedholm, CE .
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2004, 22 (04) :479-492
[6]   Undergraduate Students Experience of Nutrition Education Using the Flipped Classroom Approach: A Descriptive Cohort Study [J].
Burkhart, Sarah J. ;
Taylor, Jane A. ;
Kynn, Mary ;
Craven, Dana L. ;
Swanepoel, Libby C. .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR, 2020, 52 (04) :394-400
[7]   Students' Perspective on Active Learning in Nutrition Education [J].
Caetano dos Santos, Amanda Gisele ;
Fagundes, Andhressa ;
Ferreira Barbosa, Kiriaque Barra ;
Barreto, Nayane Santiago .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR, 2020, 52 (04) :415-420
[8]   Nutrition and health as virtual class at Open University (Portugal): pedagogical strategies for higher education [J].
Carapeto, Cristina ;
Vieira Barros, Daniela Melare .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 16 (1)
[9]  
Carwile J., 2007, INQUIRY, V12, P68
[10]  
Chan S., 2010, Journal of Adult Education, V39, P26