Private and public willingness to pay for safety: A validity test

被引:9
作者
Andersson, Henrik [1 ]
Levivier, Elodie [1 ]
Lindberg, Gunnar [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse Capitole, Toulouse Sch Econ, Toulouse, France
[2] Inst Transport Econ TOI, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Contingent valuation; Private safety; Public safety; Stated preferences; Willingness to pay; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ROAD SAFETY; RISK REDUCTION; ALTRUISM; BIAS; HEALTH; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.022
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Stated preference (SP) methods are often used to elicit an affected population's preferences for, e.g., increased safety or better environmental quality. SP methods are based on hypothetical market scenarios which have advantages, since decision alternatives are known to the analysis, but also necessitate thorough validity tests of the results, since decisions are hypothetical. This study suggests a validity test based on theoretical predictions and empirical findings for private and public safety measures. According to the test, willingness to pay (WTP) for a public safety measure should exceed or be equal to the private one. Based on a rich data set eliciting both private and public WTP the results show that private WTP exceeds public WTP. Hence, the findings in this study highlight the importance of validity tests of preference estimates for safety, and suggest that WTP also for a private safety measure should be elicited in studies eliciting WTP for public safety measures, to allow for the validity test.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 175
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Are the affluent prepared to pay for the planet? Explaining willingness to pay for public and quasi-private environmental goods in Switzerland [J].
Reto Meyer ;
Ulf Liebe .
Population and Environment, 2010, 32 :42-65
[42]   Endogenous private health investment and the willingness to pay for public health projects: The effects of income [J].
Liu, LQ ;
Neilson, WS .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2005, 87 (03) :415-420
[43]   The criterion validity of willingness to pay methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence [J].
Kanya, Lucy ;
Sanghera, Sabina ;
Lewin, Alex ;
Fox-Rushby, Julia .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2019, 232 :238-261
[44]   Willingness to pay to improve air quality: A study of private owners in Klang Valley, Malaysia [J].
Bazrbachi, Abdullatif ;
Sidique, Shaufique Fahmi ;
Shamsudin, Mad Nasir ;
Radam, Alias ;
Kaffashi, Sara ;
Adam, Shehu Usman .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 148 :73-83
[45]   Public Willingness to Pay and Policy Preferences for Tidal Energy Research and Development: A Study of Households in Washington State [J].
Polis, Hilary Jacqueline ;
Dreyer, Stacia Jeanne ;
Jenkins, Lekelia Danielle .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 136 :213-225
[46]   Socioeconomic Determinants of Willingness to Pay for Emergency Public Dental Services in Saudi Arabia: A Contingent Valuation Approach [J].
Hawsawi, Halah Saleh ;
Immurana, Mustapha ;
Al-Hanawi, Mohammed Khaled .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (22)
[47]   Cotton farmers' willingness to pay for pest management services in northern Benin [J].
Kpade, Cokou Patrice ;
Mensah, Edouard Romeo ;
Fok, Michel ;
Ndjeunga, Jupiter .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 48 (01) :105-114
[48]   Willingness to pay for road safety and estimates of the risk of death: Evidence from a Swedish contingent valuation study [J].
Andersson, Henrik .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2007, 39 (04) :853-865
[49]   Comparing the validity of the payment card and structured haggling willingness to pay methods: The case of a diabetes prevention program in rural Kenya [J].
Kangethe, Anne ;
Franic, Duska M. ;
Corso, Phaedra S. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2016, 169 :86-96
[50]   Willingness to pay as patient preference to bariatric surgery [J].
Khawali, Cristina ;
Ferraz, Marcos B. ;
Zanella, Maria T. ;
Ferreira, Sandra R. G. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2014, 17 (01) :73-81