Private and public willingness to pay for safety: A validity test

被引:9
|
作者
Andersson, Henrik [1 ]
Levivier, Elodie [1 ]
Lindberg, Gunnar [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse Capitole, Toulouse Sch Econ, Toulouse, France
[2] Inst Transport Econ TOI, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Contingent valuation; Private safety; Public safety; Stated preferences; Willingness to pay; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ROAD SAFETY; RISK REDUCTION; ALTRUISM; BIAS; HEALTH; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.022
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Stated preference (SP) methods are often used to elicit an affected population's preferences for, e.g., increased safety or better environmental quality. SP methods are based on hypothetical market scenarios which have advantages, since decision alternatives are known to the analysis, but also necessitate thorough validity tests of the results, since decisions are hypothetical. This study suggests a validity test based on theoretical predictions and empirical findings for private and public safety measures. According to the test, willingness to pay (WTP) for a public safety measure should exceed or be equal to the private one. Based on a rich data set eliciting both private and public WTP the results show that private WTP exceeds public WTP. Hence, the findings in this study highlight the importance of validity tests of preference estimates for safety, and suggest that WTP also for a private safety measure should be elicited in studies eliciting WTP for public safety measures, to allow for the validity test.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 175
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Willingness to pay for private and public road safety in stated preference studies: Why the difference?
    Svensson, Mikael
    Johansson, Maria Vredin
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2010, 42 (04) : 1205 - 1212
  • [2] Willingness to pay for private and public traffic safety improvements: the importance of the underlying good
    Jarnberg, Linda Andersson
    Andren, Daniela
    Hultkrantz, Lars
    Rutstrom, E. Elisabet
    Vimefall, Elin
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [3] Experience, attitudes, and willingness to pay for public safety
    Donahue, Amy K.
    Miller, Joanne M.
    AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 36 (04) : 395 - 418
  • [4] Status of public-private partnership recognition and willingness to pay for private health care in China
    Wang, Yongfei
    Zhang, Liang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 34 (02) : E1188 - E1199
  • [5] Individual and household willingness to pay for public goods
    Quiggin, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) : 58 - 63
  • [6] Willingness-to-pay for road safety improvement
    Haddak, Mohamed Mouloud
    Lefevre, Marie
    Havet, Nathalie
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2016, 87 : 1 - 10
  • [7] Revisiting the Gap between the Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept for Public Goods
    Vossler, Christian A.
    Bergeron, Stephane
    Doyon, Maurice
    Rondeau, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2023, 10 (02) : 413 - 445
  • [8] To Pay or Not to Pay: Competing Theories to Explain Individuals' Willingness to Pay for Public Environmental Goods
    Liebe, Ulf
    Preisendoerfer, Peter
    Meyerhoff, Juergen
    ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2011, 43 (01) : 106 - 130
  • [9] GET MORE, PAY MORE? An elaborate test of construct validity of willingness to pay per QALY estimates obtained through contingent valuation
    Bobinac, Ana
    van Exel, N. Job A.
    Rutten, Frans F. H.
    Brouwer, Werner B. F.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2012, 31 (01) : 158 - 168
  • [10] Cost of public goods affects willingness to pay for them
    Baron, J
    Maxwell, NP
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 1996, 9 (03) : 173 - 183