Sublingual immunotherapy by means of disposable single-dose containers - Tolerability and acceptance in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis due to grass pollen

被引:0
|
作者
Wolf, Hendrik [1 ]
Schnitker, Joerg [2 ]
Stein, Ulrike
机构
[1] ALK SCHERAX Arzneimittel GmbH, D-22880 Wedel, Germany
[2] Inst Appl Stat, Bielefeld, Germany
关键词
SLIT; disposable single-dose container; allergic rhinoconjunctivitis; grass pollen; young patients;
D O I
10.1027/0838-1925.19.4.130
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is appropriate for home treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic bronchial asthma. This study investigated patient acceptance and tolerability of a new SLIT treatment. Methods/Data base: This observational cohort study included 177 patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and/or allergic bronchial asthma. Patients self-administered SLIT drops during an initial updosing and treatment phase, and an optional maintenance treatment phase. Patient acceptance and tolerability of SLIT were recorded through physician assessment and patients' diaries after each phase. Data are presented using summary statistics. Statistical estimates (chi(2) and U test) examined differences between age groups (<= 14 and >= 15 years). Results: 90.2% of patients completed the initial updosing and treatment phase; median treatment duration was 154 days. Adverse drug reactions were recorded in 14 patients, only I event was serious. Over 90% of patients and physicians rated the tolerability of SLIT as good or very good both in the initial phase and the maintenance phase. Patients' acceptance of SLIT treatment was high: Handling and once-daily dosing was particularly acceptable in the initial phase (50.9% and 47.9% of patients, respectively, rated their satisfaction as very good). The percentage of patients responding to different eye and nose symptoms ranged from 69.6% to 80.9%. The proportion of patients receiving any symptomatically effective medication decreased from 93.8% to 59.4% in patients aged <= 14 years, and from 91.2% to 61.4% in patients aged >= 15 years. Conclusions: This observational study reported a high level of patient acceptance and tolerability with SLIT treatment in a predominantly young population.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 136
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-relevant benefit of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with a 300 IR birch pollen extract in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
    Hadler, M.
    Karagiannis, E.
    Feuerhahn, J.
    Blome, C.
    Augustin, M.
    ALLERGY, 2016, 71 : 247 - 247
  • [42] IMMUNOTHERAPY WITH ALGINATE-CONJUGATED AND ALUM-PRECIPITATED GRASS-POLLEN EXTRACTS IN PATIENTS WITH ALLERGIC RHINOCONJUNCTIVITIS
    PEGELOW, KO
    BELIN, L
    BROMAN, P
    HEILBORN, H
    SUNDIN, B
    WATSON, K
    ALLERGY, 1984, 39 (04) : 275 - 290
  • [43] Sublingual versus injective immunotherapy in grass pollen allergic patients: A double blind (double dummy) study
    Quirino, T
    Iemoli, E
    Siciliani, E
    Parmiani, S
    Milazzo, F
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1996, 26 (11): : 1253 - 1261
  • [44] Evolution of grass-pollen allergic patients treated with sublingual immunotherapy during a precoseasonal period.
    Roger, A.
    Santos, C.
    Valls, A.
    de Frutos, C.
    Guardia, P.
    Garcia, M.
    ALLERGY, 2012, 67 : 528 - 528
  • [45] Sustained 3-year efficacy of pre- and coseasonal 5-grass-pollen sublingual immunotherapy tablets in patients with grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis
    Didier, Alain
    Worm, Margitta
    Horak, Friedrich
    Sussman, Gordon
    de Beaumont, Olivier
    Le Gall, Martine
    Melac, Michel
    Malling, Hans-Jorgen
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 128 (03) : 559 - 566
  • [46] Evaluation of the safety of a seasonal ultra rush high-dose sublingual immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis to tree pollen and grass pollen
    Seidenberg, J.
    Bauer, C. P.
    Pajno, G.
    Sieber, J.
    Fadel, R.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2006, 36 (09): : 1205 - 1206
  • [47] Efficacy and safety of 300IR 5-grass pollen sublingual allergen immunotherapy tablets in adult patients with grass-pollen rhinoconjunctivitis in United States
    Cox, L.
    Casale, T.
    Nayak, A.
    Bernstein, D.
    Mekhaldi, S.
    de Beaumont, O.
    Melac, M.
    Montagut, A.
    Creticos, P.
    ALLERGY, 2011, 66 : 63 - 63
  • [48] High-dose sublingual immunotherapy with single-dose aqueous grass pollen extract in children is effective and safe: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Wahn, Ulrich
    Klimek, Ludger
    Ploszczuk, Anna
    Adelt, Thomas
    Sandner, Bernhard
    Trebas-Pietras, Ewa
    Eberle, Peter
    Bufe, Albrecht
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2012, 130 (04) : 886 - +
  • [49] Double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of sublingual immunotherapy with standardized olive pollen extract in pediatric patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and mild asthma due to olive pollen sensitization
    Vourdas, D
    Syrigou, E
    Carat, F
    Batard, T
    Andre, C
    Papageorgiou, PS
    ALLERGY, 1998, 53 (07) : 662 - 672
  • [50] Efficacy of 5-grass pollen extract sublingual tablet in patients with grass pollen-associated allergic rhinoconjunctivitis assessed by daily combined score: pooled study results
    Zeldin, R. K.
    Ambroisine, L.
    Cognet-Sice, J.
    Paolozzi, L.
    ALLERGY, 2014, 69 : 185 - 185