Relational ownership, institutional context, and internationalization of state-owned enterprises: When and how are multinational co-owners a plus?

被引:33
作者
Mariotti, Sergio [1 ]
Marzano, Riccardo [2 ]
机构
[1] DIG Politecn Milano, Dept Management Econ & Ind Engn, Milan, Italy
[2] DIAG Sapienza Univ Roma, Dept Comp Control & Management Engn, Via Ariosto 25, I-00185 Rome, Italy
关键词
institutional theory; internationalization; multinational enterprises; relational ownership; state-owned enterprises; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; PANEL-DATA; CAPITALISM; GOVERNMENT; BUSINESS; DIVERSIFICATION; VARIETIES;
D O I
10.1002/gsj.1379
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research Summary We investigate when and how a foreign multinational enterprise by acting as a relational co-owner helps the internationalization of hybrid state-owned enterprises. We merge the "liability of stateness" and the "government as strategist" perspectives with an institutional context-based approach. We claim that the effect of multinational enterprise relational co-ownership is contingent on the countries' institutional settings. It is positive at lower levels of both institutional coordination (as a measure of variety of capitalism) and government effectiveness. This effect is mitigated as coordination and government effectiveness increase. Further, a comparison between hybrid state-owned and private-owned enterprises shows that the magnitude of the contribution by foreign relational co-owners to internationalization is also moderated by institutional variables. Managerial Summary Opportunities and challenges for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) to expand their activities abroad and to climb the rankings of the world-class multinational corporations have been emerging. However, these enterprises often lack the experience required for internationalization and suffer from the inward-looking orientation and political interferences of their national governments. This is especially true when governments are ineffective in getting things done, and the local institutions limit their role to sustaining a positive regulatory internal market, but with no strategy to promote multinational state-owned players. Under these conditions, the co-ownership with a foreign proactive industrial partner can be an effective strategy for SOEs to overcome the difficulties in entering foreign markets.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 812
页数:34
相关论文
共 94 条
[11]  
Atkinson A., 1980, LECT PUBLIC EC
[12]   The governance role of multiple large shareholders: Evidence from the valuation of cash holdings [J].
Attig N. ;
El Ghoul S. ;
Guedhami O. ;
Rizeanu S. .
Journal of Management & Governance, 2013, 17 (2) :419-451
[13]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[14]   THE BENEFITS OF INTERNATIONALIZATION FOR STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES [J].
Benito, Gabriel R. G. ;
Rygh, Asmund ;
Lunnan, Randi .
GLOBAL STRATEGY JOURNAL, 2016, 6 (04) :269-288
[15]   Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models [J].
Blundell, R ;
Bond, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1998, 87 (01) :115-143
[16]   Government Control of Privatized Firms [J].
Bortolotti, Bernardo ;
Faccio, Mara .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (08) :2907-2939
[17]   STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES AROUND THE WORLD AS HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS [J].
Bruton, Garry D. ;
Peng, Mike W. ;
Ahlstrom, David ;
Stan, Ciprian ;
Xu, Kehan .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 29 (01) :92-114
[18]  
Buckley P.I., 1976, FUTURE MULTINATIONAL, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-02899-3
[19]   National institutional systems, foreign ownership and firm performance: The case of understudied countries [J].
Carney, Michael ;
Estrin, Saul ;
Liang, Zhixiang ;
Shapiro, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2019, 54 (04) :244-257
[20]  
Caves RE, 2007, CAMB SURV ECON LIT, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511619113